- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:41:47 -0500
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Henri Sivonen wrote: >>> I'm particularly worried about ccREL succeeding to the point that an >>> alternative solution can no longer be launched into the market to >>> replace it and Free Culture then getting encumbered by the syntactic >>> complexity preventing even further success. > > Note that I didn't talk about unqualified success in the part you > quoted. Just about qualified success to the point where an alternative > solution (which if deployed first would have taken Free Culture > licensing metadata to its Full Potential) could no longer be launched > into the market. Henri, the statements concerning a "hypothetically better solution" to ccREL without proposing a solid counter-solution is a logical fallacy, specifically, it is the Perfect Solution Fallacy[1]. Here's an example of this fallacy in action: Person A: I have a solution and here it is. Person B: That's not a good solution, there's a better one out there. We can't have a logical discussion on actual-solution vs. hypothetical-solution since the hypothetical solution always wins (per the Perfect Solution Fallacy). You have to provide a better counter-solution to ccREL in order to make your point. -- manu [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_solution_fallacy -- Manu Sporny President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Scaling Past 100,000 Concurrent Web Service Requests http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2008/09/30/scaling-webservices-part-1
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 17:42:31 UTC