Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009

Ian,

In [1] you asked, quite rightly, for 'problem statements' re RDFa. I've
pointed out two (IMHO important) ones at [1] which you *might* have
overlooked. I'd be happy to learn from you if you think these are
'acceptable':

1. Service and product provider can't include the meaning of the things they
publish in HTML. For example, how do you find out where the price of a book
is located in, say, a page from Amazon? Now, people that want to use this
data are forced to perform *screen scraping*, that is, there is a need for
publisher-push rather than consumer-pull semantics.

2. People doing data mash-ups need to learn a plethora of APIs/formats while
all they would likely want is *one data model* + and a bunch of vocabularies
covering the domain.

Cheers,
      Michael

[1] 
http://realtech.burningbird.net/semantic-web/semantic-markup/stop-justifying
-rdfa

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html
http://webofdata.wordpress.com/


> From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:47:55 -0800
> To: 'Manu Sporny' <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, 'Ian Hickson' <ian@hixie.ch>,
> 'RDFa mailing list' <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
> Cc: 'Sam Ruby' <rubys@intertwingly.net>, 'Dan Brickley' <danbri@danbri.org>,
> 'Michael Bolger' <michael@michaelbolger.net>, <public-rdfa@w3.org>, 'Tim
> Berners-Lee' <timbl@w3.org>, 'Dan Connolly' <connolly@w3.org>
> Subject: RE: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009
> Resent-From: <public-rdfa@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:48:39 +0000
> 
> 
>> Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> To reiterate: I have approached and been approached by a number of people
>>> in the RDF and RDFa communities, and I have repeatedly asked for people to
>>> list problems and use cases that are of relevance in the context of RDFa
>>> and RDF, with those problem descriptions not mentioning RDFa or other
>>> technical solutions. So far we have seen *very few* of these.
>> 
>> We have been gathering a complete list of Use Cases for the HTML5+RDFa
>> discussion here:
>> 
>> http://rdfa.info/wiki/rdfa-use-cases
>> 
>> There are 18 use cases so far, not including the ones from the W3C. If
>> you have one that is not listed on that page, please add it to the wiki,
>> or notify the public-rdfa@w3.org mailing list so that we can add it to
>> the wiki.
>> 
> 
> 17 actually, numbered from 2 to 18
> 
> 2, 6, 15  : mentions RDF in the problem description (I think irredeemably -
> i.e. these are just too techy to be meaningful use cases)
> 
> 11, 12, 13, 14, 16: while being RDFa specific on the surface could easily be
> reworded not to be.
> I believe such rewording would be beneficial.
> 
> So I make it less than 10 that meet Ian's not unreasonable requirements, which
> could be increased to about 14.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
> 
> Snapshot of wiki numbering:
> Contents
> 
>     * 1 Introduction
>     * 2 Resource List Management Tool for Undergraduate Students
>     * 3 Yahoo! SearchMonkey
>     * 4 Creative Commons Rights Expression Language
>     * 5 Bitmunk - An Open, Digital Media Commerce Standard
>     * 6 Fuzzbot Semantic Processor
>     * 7 Basic Structured Blogging
>     * 8 Publishing an Event
>     * 9 Content Management Metadata
>     * 10 Self-Contained HTML Fragments
>     * 11 Web Clipboard
>     * 12 Semantic Wiki
>     * 13 Augmented Browsing for Scientists
>     * 14 Advanced Data Structures
>     * 15 Publishing a RDF Vocabulary
>     * 16 Extending an XML language by flexible metadata
>     * 17 General Mechanism for Assigning ISO Codes to Object Data
>     * 18 Enhancing a User-Agent's copy/paste operations with meta data
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 21:05:11 UTC