- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:04:31 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Michael Bolger <michael@michaelbolger.net>, public-rdfa@w3.org, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Henri Sivonen wrote: > ... > This reminds me of the ARIA naming debate. Towards the end of the > debate, it felt like proponents of the colon were more interested in > keeping up the syntactic appearance of Namespaces than actually > protecting a Namespace-wise architecturally sound programming model. > ... I guess that's because many people care more about that's on the wire (in the document), than what happens in the API. BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 16 February 2009 14:05:22 UTC