- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:22:58 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Michael Bolger <michael@michaelbolger.net>, public-rdfa@w3.org, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Sam, I have one question, what does this mean? << Again, I'm not certain that marketing is the right answer. At the present time, the editor of the HTML 5 specification is profoundly unconvinced that RDFa either has a valid use case or is the best way to address the use cases that have been provided. I see several ways forward, none of which involves battles, direction from on high, or marketing. 1) Convince Ian that RDFa has merit. >> Why does Ian have to be convinced? All references to "Ian" are always about him being the sole decision maker. Does an "Editor" determine the fate of a spec, solely? I desperately hope I am simply misunderstanding the general rhetoric around HTML5 and RDFa. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 16:23:37 UTC