public-hydra@w3.org from February 2014: by thread

Hydra Vocab and Content Negotiation Kingsley Idehen (Saturday, 15 February)

ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) Sam Goto (Friday, 14 February)

RE: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) Markus Lanthaler (Friday, 14 February)
Re: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) Sam Goto (Friday, 14 February)
- RE: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 17 February)
Re: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) Sam Goto (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) Sam Goto (Wednesday, 26 February)
  - Re: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) Savas Parastatidis (Thursday, 27 February)

Re: Nested structures / ISSUE-26 (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) Sam Goto (Friday, 14 February)

RE: Nested structures / ISSUE-26 (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) Markus Lanthaler (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: Nested structures / ISSUE-26 Kingsley Idehen (Friday, 14 February)
  - Re: Nested structures / ISSUE-26 Sam Goto (Friday, 14 February)

Re: W3C standardization process James Langley (Thursday, 13 February)

RE: W3C standardization process Markus Lanthaler (Thursday, 13 February)

RE: Interoperability with Linked Data Platform (especially regarding collections and paging) ISSUE-36 Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 10 February)

Re: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal Sam Goto (Monday, 10 February)

Interoperability with Linked Data Platform (especially regarding collections and paging) Andreas Kuckartz (Sunday, 9 February)

Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Mark Baker (Thursday, 6 February)

RE: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Markus Lanthaler (Thursday, 6 February)
- RE: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Markus Lanthaler (Friday, 7 February)
  - Unsubscribing Andreas Kuckartz (Friday, 7 February)
    - Re: Unsubscribing Andreas Kuckartz (Friday, 7 February)
Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Ryan J. McDonough (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? Kingsley Idehen (Friday, 7 February)
- RE: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Markus Lanthaler (Sunday, 9 February)
Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Mark Baker (Wednesday, 12 February)
- RE: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Markus Lanthaler (Thursday, 13 February)
Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Mark Baker (Friday, 21 February)
- RE: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Markus Lanthaler (Friday, 28 February)

FW: An updated draft of the schema.org/Actions proposal! Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 4 February)

Re: My opinion about hydra vocabulary László Lajos Jánszky (Tuesday, 4 February)

Reconciling hydra rest semantics for collections with typical RDF entity relationships Gregg Kellogg (Monday, 3 February)

RE: Reconciling hydra rest semantics for collections with typical RDF entity relationships Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: Reconciling hydra rest semantics for collections with typical RDF entity relationships Kingsley Idehen (Tuesday, 4 February)
  - Re: Reconciling hydra rest semantics for collections with typical RDF entity relationships Gregg Kellogg (Tuesday, 4 February)
    - RE: Reconciling hydra rest semantics for collections with typical RDF entity relationships Paul Kuykendall (Tuesday, 4 February)
      - RE: Reconciling hydra rest semantics for collections with typical RDF entity relationships Markus Lanthaler (Wednesday, 5 February)
    - Re: Reconciling hydra rest semantics for collections with typical RDF entity relationships Judson Lester (Thursday, 6 February)
      - Re: Reconciling hydra rest semantics for collections with typical RDF entity relationships Gregg Kellogg (Thursday, 6 February)
        
        Re: Reconciling hydra rest semantics for collections with typical RDF entity relationships Judson Lester (Thursday, 6 February)
        
        RE: Reconciling hydra rest semantics for collections with typical RDF entity relationships Markus Lanthaler (Friday, 7 February)
Re: Reconciling hydra rest semantics for collections with typical RDF entity relationships Gregg Kellogg (Tuesday, 4 February)
- RE: Reconciling hydra rest semantics for collections with typical RDF entity relationships Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 4 February)

RE: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 3 February)

RE: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 3 February)
Re: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses Kingsley Idehen (Monday, 3 February)
- RE: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 3 February)
  - Re: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses Kingsley Idehen (Monday, 3 February)
    - RE: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 4 February)
      - Re: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses Kingsley Idehen (Tuesday, 4 February)
        
        RE: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 4 February)
        
        Re: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses Kingsley Idehen (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses Gregg Kellogg (Monday, 3 February)
  - RE: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses Paul Kuykendall (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses Kingsley Idehen (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses Ryan J. McDonough (Tuesday, 4 February)
  - ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 4 February)
    - Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Ryan J. McDonough (Wednesday, 5 February)
      - RE: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Markus Lanthaler (Wednesday, 5 February)
    - Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Ryan J. McDonough (Saturday, 15 February)
      - Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? Thomas Hoppe (Saturday, 15 February)
        
        Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? Ryan J. McDonough (Saturday, 15 February)
        
        Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? Thomas Hoppe (Sunday, 16 February)
        Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? Ryan J. McDonough (Sunday, 16 February)
        RE: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 17 February)
        
        Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? Ryan J. McDonough (Monday, 17 February)
        
        RE: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 18 February)
        
        Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? Ryan J. McDonough (Tuesday, 18 February)
        
        RE: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? Markus Lanthaler (Friday, 28 February)
  - ISSUE-32: Should hydra:returns and hydra:statusCodes be removed to avoid tight coupling? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 4 February)
    - Re: ISSUE-32: Should hydra:returns and hydra:statusCodes be removed to avoid tight coupling? Kingsley Idehen (Tuesday, 4 February)
      - RE: ISSUE-32: Should hydra:returns and hydra:statusCodes be removed to avoid tight coupling? Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 4 February)
        
        Re: ISSUE-32: Should hydra:returns and hydra:statusCodes be removed to avoid tight coupling? Kingsley Idehen (Tuesday, 4 February)
    - Re: ISSUE-32: Should hydra:returns and hydra:statusCodes be removed to avoid tight coupling? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) Ryan J. McDonough (Wednesday, 5 February)
      - Re: ISSUE-32: Should hydra:returns and hydra:statusCodes be removed to avoid tight coupling? Thomas Hoppe (Wednesday, 5 February)
        
        Re: ISSUE-32: Should hydra:returns and hydra:statusCodes be removed to avoid tight coupling? Ryan J. McDonough (Wednesday, 5 February)
        
        Re: ISSUE-32: Should hydra:returns and hydra:statusCodes be removed to avoid tight coupling? Thomas Hoppe (Thursday, 6 February)
        Re: ISSUE-32: Should hydra:returns and hydra:statusCodes be removed to avoid tight coupling? Ruben Verborgh (Thursday, 6 February)
        Re: ISSUE-32: Should hydra:returns and hydra:statusCodes be removed to avoid tight coupling? Thomas Hoppe (Thursday, 6 February)
      - RE: ISSUE-32: Should hydra:returns and hydra:statusCodes be removed to avoid tight coupling? Markus Lanthaler (Wednesday, 5 February)
- Re: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses Ryan J. McDonough (Tuesday, 4 February)

RE: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 3 February)

Re: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Ruben Verborgh (Wednesday, 5 February)
- Re: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Kingsley Idehen (Wednesday, 5 February)
- RE: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Markus Lanthaler (Thursday, 6 February)
  - Re: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Ruben Verborgh (Thursday, 6 February)
    - RE: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Markus Lanthaler (Sunday, 9 February)
      - Re: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Ruben Verborgh (Monday, 10 February)
        
        Re: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Kingsley Idehen (Monday, 10 February)
        
        Re: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Thomas Hoppe (Monday, 10 February)
        
        Re: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Ruben Verborgh (Monday, 10 February)
        Re: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Thomas Hoppe (Monday, 10 February)
        Re: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Ruben Verborgh (Monday, 10 February)
        
        Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 10 February)
        Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) Ruben Verborgh (Tuesday, 11 February)
        RE: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 11 February)
        Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) Ruben Verborgh (Tuesday, 11 February)
        RE: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) Markus Lanthaler (Wednesday, 12 February)
        
        Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) Thomas Hoppe (Friday, 14 February)
        Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) Ruben Verborgh (Friday, 14 February)
        Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) Thomas Hoppe (Saturday, 15 February)
        Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) Ruben Verborgh (Saturday, 15 February)
        Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) Thomas Hoppe (Tuesday, 18 February)
        Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) Ruben Verborgh (Wednesday, 19 February)
        Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) Ruben Verborgh (Wednesday, 19 February)
        
        Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) Thomas Hoppe (Thursday, 20 February)
        
        RE: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 17 February)

RE: concerns about hydra:mappings Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 3 February)

Re: concerns about hydra:mappings Ruben Verborgh (Wednesday, 5 February)
- RE: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Markus Lanthaler (Thursday, 6 February)
  - Re: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Ruben Verborgh (Thursday, 6 February)
    - RE: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Markus Lanthaler (Sunday, 9 February)
      - Re: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Ruben Verborgh (Monday, 10 February)
        
        RE: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 10 February)
        
        Re: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Ruben Verborgh (Tuesday, 11 February)
        RE: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 11 February)
        Re: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Ruben Verborgh (Tuesday, 11 February)
        RE: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Markus Lanthaler (Wednesday, 12 February)
        Re: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Thomas Hoppe (Wednesday, 12 February)
        Re: removing hydra:search Ruben Verborgh (Wednesday, 12 February)
        Re: removing hydra:search Thomas Hoppe (Friday, 14 February)
        Re: removing hydra:search Ruben Verborgh (Friday, 14 February)
        RE: removing hydra:search Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 17 February)
        Re: removing hydra:search Thomas Hoppe (Tuesday, 18 February)
        Re: removing hydra:search Ruben Verborgh (Wednesday, 19 February)
        
        Re: removing hydra:search Thomas Hoppe (Tuesday, 18 February)
        Re: removing hydra:search Ruben Verborgh (Wednesday, 19 February)
        Re: removing hydra:search Thomas Hoppe (Thursday, 20 February)
        RE: removing hydra:search Markus Lanthaler (Friday, 28 February)
        
        Re: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Ruben Verborgh (Thursday, 13 February)
        RE: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 17 February)
        Re: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Ruben Verborgh (Monday, 17 February)
        RE: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 17 February)
        Re: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Ruben Verborgh (Monday, 17 February)
        RE: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 18 February)
        Re: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Ruben Verborgh (Tuesday, 18 February)
        RE: concerns about hydra:mappings (ISSUE-30) Markus Lanthaler (Friday, 28 February)

Re: plural properties should become singular Gregg Kellogg (Monday, 3 February)

Re: plural properties should become singular Kingsley Idehen (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: plural properties should become singular Ruben Verborgh (Wednesday, 5 February)
  - Re: plural properties should become singular Kingsley Idehen (Wednesday, 5 February)
    - RE: plural properties should become singular Markus Lanthaler (Wednesday, 5 February)

RE: plural properties should become singular Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 3 February)

Properties and types differing only in their capitalization ISSUE-28 (was: plural properties should become singular) Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 3 February)

Re: Properties and types differing only in their capitalization ISSUE-28 (was: plural properties should become singular) Ruben Verborgh (Wednesday, 5 February)
Re: Properties and types differing only in their capitalization ISSUE-28 (was: plural properties should become singular) Ruben Verborgh (Thursday, 6 February)
- Singularization of properties and its consequences (ISSUE-25, ISSUE-27 & ISSUE-28) Markus Lanthaler (Thursday, 6 February)
  - Re: Singularization of properties and its consequences (ISSUE-25, ISSUE-27 & ISSUE-28) Kingsley Idehen (Thursday, 6 February)
  - Re: Singularization of properties and its consequences (ISSUE-25, ISSUE-27 & ISSUE-28) Thomas Hoppe (Thursday, 6 February)
    - StatusCodeDescription vs. Status (ISSUE-32) Markus Lanthaler (Sunday, 9 February)
      - Re: StatusCodeDescription vs. Status (ISSUE-32) Ruben Verborgh (Monday, 10 February)
      - Re: StatusCodeDescription vs. Status (ISSUE-32) Thomas Hoppe (Tuesday, 11 February)
        
        RE: StatusCodeDescription vs. Status (ISSUE-32) Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 11 February)
        
        Re: StatusCodeDescription vs. Status (ISSUE-32) Thomas Hoppe (Saturday, 15 February)
  - Re: Singularization of properties and its consequences (ISSUE-25, ISSUE-27 & ISSUE-28) Ruben Verborgh (Friday, 14 February)
    - RE: Singularization of properties and its consequences (ISSUE-25, ISSUE-27 & ISSUE-28) Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 17 February)
      - RE: Singularization of properties and its consequences (ISSUE-25, ISSUE-27 & ISSUE-28) Markus Lanthaler (Saturday, 22 February)
        
        Re: Singularization of properties and its consequences (ISSUE-25, ISSUE-27 & ISSUE-28) Ruben Verborgh (Saturday, 22 February)

RE: Wrap up and Discussion of ways to Specify Supported Properties and corresponding Validation Rules for Operations Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 3 February)

Re: Wrap up and Discussion of ways to Specify Supported Properties and corresponding Validation Rules for Operations Thomas Hoppe (Monday, 3 February)
- RE: Wrap up and Discussion of ways to Specify Supported Properties and corresponding Validation Rules for Operations Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 4 February)
  - Re: Wrap up and Discussion of ways to Specify Supported Properties and corresponding Validation Rules for Operations Thomas Hoppe (Tuesday, 4 February)
    - RE: Wrap up and Discussion of ways to Specify Supported Properties and corresponding Validation Rules for Operations Markus Lanthaler (Wednesday, 5 February)
      - Re: Wrap up and Discussion of ways to Specify Supported Properties and corresponding Validation Rules for Operations Thomas Hoppe (Thursday, 6 February)
        
        RE: Wrap up and Discussion of ways to Specify Supported Properties and corresponding Validation Rules for Operations Markus Lanthaler (Thursday, 6 February)
        
        Re: Wrap up and Discussion of ways to Specify Supported Properties and corresponding Validation Rules for Operations Thomas Hoppe (Thursday, 6 February)

Nested structures / ISSUE-26 (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 3 February)

RE: My opinion about hydra vocabulary Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 3 February)

RE: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 3 February)

RE: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 10 February)
RE: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal Kingsley Idehen (Tuesday, 11 February)

Re: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Ryan J. McDonough (Saturday, 1 February)

RE: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Markus Lanthaler (Monday, 3 February)
Re: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Gregg Kellogg (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Ruben Verborgh (Tuesday, 11 February)
  - Re: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Gregg Kellogg (Tuesday, 11 February)
    - RE: terminology/necessity of hydra:required Markus Lanthaler (Tuesday, 11 February)

Last message date: Friday, 28 February 2014 21:08:24 UTC