- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:48:32 +0000
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: public-hydra@w3.org, Sam Goto <goto@google.com>
> So, according to you, lies the crux of the problem in the used terminology > or in the structure of the graph? I definitely agree that the terminology is > confusing if you look at it from this perspective. Both really, they are connected to each other. SupportedProperty is now a proxy around property to allow us to attach extra metadata like hydra:required. I'd suggest to make that proxy mandatory (= stricter modeling) and give it a name that doesn't involve "Property". > Without any doubt, yeah. So you prefer the current version, right? Yes, but I'd like to see more intuitive naming. But enough from me about this. What are others' opinions? > That would be helpful, yes. I especially like the "priority of > constituencies" as defined by the HTML WG. That would be awesome. Let's start a list like that! (Where? GitHub Wiki?) Ruben
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2014 22:49:05 UTC