Re: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses

On 2/3/14 4:05 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 2/3/14 3:19 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>> I think the biggest problem is how this stuff is documented and the fact
>> that people won't read it:-)  It's not a contract. It's a hint. 
>> Clients have
>> to interpret the response in any case. Some will be more tolerant, 
>> some will
>> break when they don't get back what they expected. That's similar to how
>> people often run into troubles when parts of a website get redesigned 
>> and
>> "nothing works anymore" because it looks different or they have to take
>> different paths.
>
> This is where TURTLE is your friend. The narrative is more readable in 
> TURTLE that it will ever be in JSON-LD.
>
> JSON-LD is for the coders that don't want to make a TURTLE parser 
> etc.. But, to write good code you really have to understand what 
> exactly you are doing.
>
> I encourage you to discuss in TURTLE so that more folks get involved 
> in these discussions. I make this comment because there was a nice 
> series of points from 'John Yaya' that kinda got lost in the JSON-LD 
> examples he made. More folks would zone in if those examples are the 
> more readable TURTLE :-)
>

Hmm.. 'John Yaya' seems to be a strange denotation on my system for the 
entity denoted by the literals 'Ryan J. McDonough' [1] :-)

I was referring to an earlier thread [2] .

[1] http://damnhandy.com/
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hydra/2014Feb/0000.html .

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen