- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:16:48 +0100
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:49 PM, Ruben Verborgh wrote: > > So, according to you, lies the crux of the problem in the used > > terminology or in the structure of the graph? I definitely > > agree that the terminology is confusing if you look at it > > from this perspective. > > Both really, they are connected to each other. > SupportedProperty is now a proxy around property > to allow us to attach extra metadata like hydra:required. > > I'd suggest to make that proxy mandatory (= stricter modeling) > and give it a name that doesn't involve "Property". OK > > Without any doubt, yeah. So you prefer the current version, right? > > Yes, but I'd like to see more intuitive naming. > > But enough from me about this. What are others' opinions? > > > That would be helpful, yes. I especially like the "priority of > > constituencies" as defined by the HTML WG. > > That would be awesome. Let's start a list like that! > (Where? GitHub Wiki?) Let's use a GitHub issue instead of the wiki.. more people will look there and we won't forget it as it usually happens in wikis. I've created ISSUE-38: https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/38 -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 16:17:19 UTC