- From: László Lajos Jánszky <laszlo.janszky@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 11:59:36 +0100
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: public-hydra@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CA+=RcCoRRsmrY619Ruf_MwfXvVVMr=jcNQTSYiWn9Fq-ttoQRw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi! I just now decided to use annotations. I tried to avoid that, but I rather use annotations than static properties and methods or class names as strings... Hmm... there have been year-long debates about the distinction of resources > and representations in the Semantic Web Community. It's a very opinionated > and philosophical matter which I would like to avoid discussing here for a > number of reasons :-) If you are interested in this stuff though, you > should > look for "httpRange-14" - but please don't get lost :-) > Yes, I wanted to separate resources and representations and describe both in the metadata, but I think describing the representations and generate them in a automatic way would be too complicated. I'll rather hardcode the representations in my example applications. I'll check httpRange-14, thanks! 2014-02-03 Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>: > On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 4:39 PM, László Lajos Jánszky wrote: > > 2014-01-28 Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> > >> I have to say this looks much more complicated to me and I struggle to > >> see what you gain by doing so. > > > > Separating the description of Representations (including Links) from > > the description of Resources (including Methods) is my idea. By > > following this course, using the path to describe a Resource and using > > the queryString to describe one of the Representations of that > > Resource is a logical step. So all of these are a parts of my > > approach. Maybe it won't be the best way to describe REST API-s, time > > will decide... Until then. > > Hmm... there have been year-long debates about the distinction of resources > and representations in the Semantic Web Community. It's a very opinionated > and philosophical matter which I would like to avoid discussing here for a > number of reasons :-) If you are interested in this stuff though, you > should > look for "httpRange-14" - but please don't get lost :-) > > And btw. please keep us posted on your progress. > > > Cheers, > Markus > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 11:00:03 UTC