Re: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses

On Feb 3, 2014, at 4:05 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:

> On 2/3/14 3:19 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>> I think the biggest problem is how this stuff is documented and the fact
>> that people won't read it:-)  It's not a contract. It's a hint. Clients have
>> to interpret the response in any case. Some will be more tolerant, some will
>> break when they don't get back what they expected. That's similar to how
>> people often run into troubles when parts of a website get redesigned and
>> "nothing works anymore" because it looks different or they have to take
>> different paths.
> 
> This is where TURTLE is your friend. The narrative is more readable in TURTLE that it will ever be in JSON-LD.
> 
> JSON-LD is for the coders that don't want to make a TURTLE parser etc.. But, to write good code you really have to understand what exactly you are doing.
> 
> I encourage you to discuss in TURTLE so that more folks get involved in these discussions. I make this comment because there was a nice series of points from 'John Yaya' that kinda got lost in the JSON-LD examples he made. More folks would zone in if those examples are the more readable TURTLE :-)
> 

LOL! The whole ‘John Yaya’ thing was fro throw some annoying reciters off my trail. You’d be amazed at how good that works.

But yes, I think some Turtle examples could help make some this a bit easier on the eyes. 

> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kingsley Idehen	
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> 
> 
> 
> 
>