RE: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) from Markus Lanthaler on 2014-02-06 (public-hydra@w3.org from February 2014)

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 18:29:14 +0100
To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
Cc: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>
Message-ID: <015d01cf2360$f5883250$e09896f0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>

> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> > Great. So, before I close this issue I would like to get Mark's
> > opinion (that's why I CCed you). Mark, do you agree with Ryan on
> > this or do you think Operations do violate REST's uniform
> > interface constraint?
> 
> I believe they violate the constraint, yes.

Let me ask a provocative question: Why do you think Operations violate the
constraint whereas link relations, which further describe a potential GET
request, don't?

--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 17:29:47 UTC