- From: Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>
- Date: 7 Feb 2014 13:45:22 +0100
- To: "'Krishna Oruganti Chiranjevi'" <koruganti@elm.sa>
- Cc: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, public-hydra@w3.org
Hi Krishna, to unsubscribe you need to leave the Hydra Community Group. Unsubscribing without leaving the CG at the same time does not make much sense and perhaps is not even possible. Did you already leave the CG? (I am chairing another CG and also received an unsubscribe request once.) Cheers, Andreas --- Markus Lanthaler: > Hi Krishna, > > I'm on it. Should be a matter of a couple of hours. > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Krishna Oruganti Chiranjevi [mailto:koruganti@elm.sa] >> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 3:33 AM >> To: Markus Lanthaler >> Cc: public-hydra@w3.org; Mark Baker >> Subject: Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform >> interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation >> Subclasses) >> >> Dear Markus >> I have got 15 mails plus mails in a day even after requested for >> unsubscribe. Please act on unsubscribe. >> Thanks in advance, >> Regards,, >> Krishna. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 06-Feb-2014, at 8:30 pm, "Markus Lanthaler" >> <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: >> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: >>>>> Great. So, before I close this issue I would like to get Mark's >>>>> opinion (that's why I CCed you). Mark, do you agree with Ryan on >>>>> this or do you think Operations do violate REST's uniform >>>>> interface constraint? >>>> >>>> I believe they violate the constraint, yes. >>> >>> Let me ask a provocative question: Why do you think Operations >> violate the >>> constraint whereas link relations, which further describe a potential >> GET >>> request, don't? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Markus Lanthaler >>> @markuslanthaler >>> >>> >> >> This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it are >> intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain legally >> privileged and confidential information. If the reader of this message >> is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for >> delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby >> notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of >> this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by >> replying to this message and please delete it from your computer. > > > >
Received on Friday, 7 February 2014 12:46:04 UTC