public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from June 2015 by thread

RE: reviewing the BP doc Makx Dekkers (Monday, 29 June)

Fwd: Agenda for tomorrow's call Riccardo Albertoni (Friday, 26 June)

[dwbp] Comment tracker Newton Calegari (Friday, 26 June)

Fwd: Agenda for tomorrow's call Riccardo Albertoni (Friday, 26 June)

some comments on the DWBP draft Erik Wilde (Friday, 26 June)

comments regarding versioning Erik Wilde (Thursday, 25 June)

Publications live Phil Archer (Thursday, 25 June)

Agenda for tomorrow's call Hadley Beeman (Thursday, 25 June)

Coincidentally... Phil Archer (Wednesday, 24 June)

Enrichment document Phil Archer (Tuesday, 23 June)

DUV FPWD Phil Archer (Monday, 22 June)

BP doc ready for 2015-06-25 Phil Archer (Monday, 22 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-196 (annette_g): Data enrichment [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 19 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-195 (annette_g): Provide data up to date [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 19 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-194 (annette_g): Data Identification [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 19 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-193 (annette_g): Data Versioning [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 19 June)

reviewing the BP doc Annette Greiner (Friday, 19 June)

Reply to comments on the document Christophe Guéret (Thursday, 18 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-192: How to represent the relationship between a dataset and its different versions? Is PAV a good solution to track dataset versioning? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 18 June)

Agenda for tomorrow's DWBP Call - vote on next PWD of BP Doc Deirdre Lee (Thursday, 18 June)

2nd DWBP WG F2F yaso@nic.br (Wednesday, 17 June)

New Connection method from *this Friday* Phil Archer (Wednesday, 17 June)

Suggestion for context section Phil Archer (Tuesday, 16 June)

Fwd: FW: Re: dwbp-ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Phil Archer (Friday, 12 June)

Re: dwbp-ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Peter.Winstanley@scotland.gsi.gov.uk (Friday, 12 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-191: Backward compatibility with DAQ and Data Cube [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 12 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-190: "official" DQV reqs vs the implementation of our best practices (cf. the "5 stars" thread). [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 12 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-189: Aether VoID extension uses a different from the pattern that DQV inherits from DAQ [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 12 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-188: Section "Express the quality of a linkset" will be completed by examples coming from Riccardo's work on measuring the quality of linksets between SKOS concept schemes [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 12 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-187: Do we want to keep the same occurrence constraints as defined in DAQ (for example, that every metric should belong to exactly one dimension)? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 12 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-186: There might be no need for a subclass link between dqv:QualityMeasure and daq:Observation. I.e., we could re-use daq:Observation directly. [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 12 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-185: dqv:QualityAnnotation modeling issues [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 12 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 12 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-183: We may want to consider a revision of DCAT to make dcat:Dataset and dcat:Distribution subclasses of prov:Entity [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 12 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-182: The label of daq:QualityGraph does not fit well with the current model [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 12 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-181: Should we have only the existing class daq:QualityGraph or keep the new class dqv:QualityMetadata? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 12 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-180: Are we actually allowed by W3C to re-use elements from DAQ? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 12 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-179: The Working Group is considering to put all new classes and properties (together with the ones of the Data Usage Vocabulary) in the DCAT namespace. [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 12 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-178: The definition of duv:Feedback needs to be reviewed because it is not clear if it should be a subclass of oa:Annotation or just an instance of oa:Motivation. [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-177: Should duv:consumes be used instead of duv:consumed? Should we be able to reify Consumption? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-176: Should prov:SoftwareAgent be used instead of Application/WebOfThing? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-175: Shouldn't duv:DatasetCorrection be a dcat:Dataset as well? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-174: The meaning of duv:retains is not clear. More examples should be provided and its use should be reviewed. [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-173: The use of cito:CitationAct and duv:Citation should be reviewed. [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-172: Should duv:generates be removed? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-171: Should dct:creator or doap:developer be used instead of duv:developedBy? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-170: Should we use Software or earl:Software instead of duv:Application? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-169: Should usage be specified at the Dataset or Distribution level? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 June)

Re: General feedback on the document Annette Greiner (Thursday, 11 June)

DQV Comments Laufer (Thursday, 11 June)

TPAC 2015 Bart van Leeuwen (Thursday, 11 June)

Re: comments on Data on the Web Best Practices Bernadette Farias Lóscio (Thursday, 11 June)

Re: Comments on Data on the Web Best Practices: BP-1 & BP-2 Bernadette Farias Lóscio (Thursday, 11 June)

Agenda for tomorrow's call — Best Practices publication Hadley Beeman (Thursday, 11 June)

Minor changes suggested for BP Phil Archer (Thursday, 11 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-168 (Dataset versioning): Dataset versioning [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 June)

dwbp-ISSUE-167 (Date & Numeric formats): DCAT lacking in date, time and number formats [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 June)

RE: New DQV editor's draft: SLA Peter.Winstanley@scotland.gsi.gov.uk (Friday, 5 June)

My comments on DUV Carlos Iglesias (Friday, 5 June)

comments on DUV and some proposals João Paulo Almeida (Friday, 5 June)

BPs on Data Identification Phil Archer (Wednesday, 3 June)

Re: data quality vocabulary - scope Antoine Isaac (Tuesday, 2 June)

Re: data quality vocabulary - dimensions Antoine Isaac (Tuesday, 2 June)

Re: New DQV editor's draft Antoine Isaac (Tuesday, 2 June)

Agenda for Friday - 5jun yaso@nic.br (Tuesday, 2 June)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2015 16:50:47 UTC