public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from June 2015 by date

Tuesday, 30 June 2015

• Re: comments regarding versioning Herbert Van de Sompel
• Re: reviewing the BP doc Laufer
• RE: reviewing the BP doc Makx Dekkers

Monday, 29 June 2015

• Re: reviewing the BP doc Laufer
• RE: reviewing the BP doc Makx Dekkers
• Re: comments regarding versioning Erik Wilde
• Re: reviewing the BP doc Laufer
• RE: reviewing the BP doc Makx Dekkers
• reviewing the BP doc Laufer
• RE: reviewing the BP doc Makx Dekkers
• RE: reviewing the BP doc Makx Dekkers

Friday, 26 June 2015

• Re: reviewing the BP doc Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Fwd: Agenda for tomorrow's call Riccardo Albertoni
• [dwbp] Comment tracker Newton Calegari
• Re: reviewing the BP doc Laufer
• Re: Publications live Christophe Guéret
• Re: reviewing the BP doc Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call Christophe Guéret
• Re: Publications live Deirdre Lee
• Fwd: Agenda for tomorrow's call Riccardo Albertoni
• some comments on the DWBP draft Erik Wilde

Thursday, 25 June 2015

• Re: Publications live Antoine Isaac
• Re: Publications live Caroline Burle
• Re: Enrichment document Annette Greiner
• Re: comments regarding versioning Herbert Van de Sompel
• comments regarding versioning Erik Wilde
• Re: Publications live Eric Stephan
• Re: Publications live Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Publications live Phil Archer
• Re: Enrichment document Caroline Burle
• Agenda for tomorrow's call Hadley Beeman

Wednesday, 24 June 2015

• Re: Enrichment document Wagner Meira Jr.
• Re: Coincidentally... Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Coincidentally... Phil Archer
• Re: Enrichment document yaso@nic.br

Tuesday, 23 June 2015

• Re: Enrichment document Antoine Isaac
• Re: DQV Comments Antoine Isaac
• Re: Enrichment document Annette Greiner
• Re: Enrichment document Steven Adler
• Re: Enrichment document Annette Greiner
• Re: DUV FPWD Eric Stephan
• Re: DUV FPWD Eric Stephan
• Re: Enrichment document yaso@nic.br
• Enrichment document Phil Archer
• Re: DUV FPWD Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: DUV FPWD Phil Archer
• Re: DUV FPWD Phil Archer
• Re: DUV FPWD Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: DUV FPWD Eric Stephan
• Re: DUV FPWD Phil Archer

Monday, 22 June 2015

• Re: comments on Data on the Web Best Practices Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: DUV FPWD Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: DUV FPWD Phil Archer
• Re: DUV FPWD Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• DUV FPWD Phil Archer
• Re: BP document - 2nd draft is ready to be published Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: BP doc ready for 2015-06-25 Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: BP document - 2nd draft is ready to be published Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• BP doc ready for 2015-06-25 Phil Archer
• Re: DQV Comments Steven Adler
• Re: BP document - 2nd draft is ready to be published Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: BP document - 2nd draft is ready to be published Phil Archer
• BP document - 2nd draft is ready to be published Caroline Burle
• RE: reviewing the BP doc Makx Dekkers
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Peter.Winstanley@scotland.gsi.gov.uk
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Peter.Winstanley@scotland.gsi.gov.uk

Friday, 19 June 2015

• Re: Document updated with raised issues before publishing it Annette Greiner
• Document updated with raised issues before publishing it Caroline Burle
• dwbp-ISSUE-196 (annette_g): Data enrichment [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-195 (annette_g): Provide data up to date [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-194 (annette_g): Data Identification [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-193 (annette_g): Data Versioning [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Suggestion for context section Antoine Isaac
• Re: Suggestion for context section Antoine Isaac
• Re: Agenda for tomorrow's DWBP Call - vote on next PWD of BP Doc Christophe Guéret
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Antoine Isaac
• Re: DQV Comments Antoine Isaac
• Re: DQV Comments Antoine Isaac
• Re: Agenda for tomorrow's DWBP Call - vote on next PWD of BP Doc Carlos Iglesias
• Re: comments on Data on the Web Best Practices Maurino Andrea
• RE: reviewing the BP doc Makx Dekkers
• reviewing the BP doc Annette Greiner

Thursday, 18 June 2015

• Re: Suggestion for context section Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Comments on Data on the Web Best Practices: BP-1 & BP-2 Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Reply to comments on the document Christophe Guéret
• dwbp-ISSUE-192: How to represent the relationship between a dataset and its different versions? Is PAV a good solution to track dataset versioning? [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Agenda for tomorrow's DWBP Call - vote on next PWD of BP Doc Deirdre Lee
• Re: Comments on Data on the Web Best Practices: BP-1 & BP-2 Andrea Perego

Wednesday, 17 June 2015

• Re: comments on Data on the Web Best Practices Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Comments on Data on the Web Best Practices: BP-1 & BP-2 Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• 2nd DWBP WG F2F yaso@nic.br
• New Connection method from *this Friday* Phil Archer

Tuesday, 16 June 2015

• Suggestion for context section Phil Archer
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Christophe Guéret

Monday, 15 June 2015

• Re: DQV Comments Steven Adler

Friday, 12 June 2015

• Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call — Best Practices publication Annette Greiner
• Re: General feedback on the document Annette Greiner
• Fwd: FW: Re: dwbp-ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Phil Archer
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Peter.Winstanley@scotland.gsi.gov.uk
• dwbp-ISSUE-191: Backward compatibility with DAQ and Data Cube [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-190: "official" DQV reqs vs the implementation of our best practices (cf. the "5 stars" thread). [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-189: Aether VoID extension uses a different from the pattern that DQV inherits from DAQ [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-188: Section "Express the quality of a linkset" will be completed by examples coming from Riccardo's work on measuring the quality of linksets between SKOS concept schemes [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-187: Do we want to keep the same occurrence constraints as defined in DAQ (for example, that every metric should belong to exactly one dimension)? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-186: There might be no need for a subclass link between dqv:QualityMeasure and daq:Observation. I.e., we could re-use daq:Observation directly. [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-185: dqv:QualityAnnotation modeling issues [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-183: We may want to consider a revision of DCAT to make dcat:Dataset and dcat:Distribution subclasses of prov:Entity [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-182: The label of daq:QualityGraph does not fit well with the current model [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-181: Should we have only the existing class daq:QualityGraph or keep the new class dqv:QualityMetadata? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-180: Are we actually allowed by W3C to re-use elements from DAQ? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-179: The Working Group is considering to put all new classes and properties (together with the ones of the Data Usage Vocabulary) in the DCAT namespace. [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-175: Shouldn't duv:DatasetCorrection be a dcat:Dataset as well? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-171: Should dct:creator or doap:developer be used instead of duv:developedBy? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-170: Should we use Software or earl:Software instead of duv:Application? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: Minor changes suggested for BP Christophe Guéret
• Re: Minor changes suggested for BP Christophe Guéret
• Re: General feedback on the document Christophe Guéret
• Re: DQV Comments Laufer

Thursday, 11 June 2015

• Re: Minor changes suggested for BP Herbert Van de Sompel
• Re: comments on DUV and some proposals Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• dwbp-ISSUE-178: The definition of duv:Feedback needs to be reviewed because it is not clear if it should be a subclass of oa:Annotation or just an instance of oa:Motivation. [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-177: Should duv:consumes be used instead of duv:consumed? Should we be able to reify Consumption? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-176: Should prov:SoftwareAgent be used instead of Application/WebOfThing? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: My comments on DUV Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• dwbp-ISSUE-175: Shouldn't duv:DatasetCorrection be a dcat:Dataset as well? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-174: The meaning of duv:retains is not clear. More examples should be provided and its use should be reviewed. [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-173: The use of cito:CitationAct and duv:Citation should be reviewed. [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-172: Should duv:generates be removed? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-171: Should dct:creator or doap:developer be used instead of duv:developedBy? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-170: Should we use Software or earl:Software instead of duv:Application? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-169: Should usage be specified at the Dataset or Distribution level? [Data Usage Vocabulary] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: DQV Comments Antoine Isaac
• Re: Minor changes suggested for BP Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-167 (Date & Numeric formats): DCAT lacking in date, time and number formats [Best practices document(s)] Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: General feedback on the document Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Minor changes suggested for BP Herbert Van de Sompel
• Re: Minor changes suggested for BP Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: General feedback on the document Annette Greiner
• Re: TPAC 2015 Bart van Leeuwen
• Re: TPAC 2015 Phil Archer
• Re: Minor changes suggested for BP Phil Archer
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-167 (Date & Numeric formats): DCAT lacking in date, time and number formats [Best practices document(s)] Annette Greiner
• DQV Comments Laufer
• Re: Minor changes suggested for BP Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• TPAC 2015 Bart van Leeuwen
• Re: comments on Data on the Web Best Practices Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: Comments on Data on the Web Best Practices: BP-1 & BP-2 Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Agenda for tomorrow's call — Best Practices publication Hadley Beeman
• Minor changes suggested for BP Phil Archer
• dwbp-ISSUE-168 (Dataset versioning): Dataset versioning [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ISSUE-167 (Date & Numeric formats): DCAT lacking in date, time and number formats [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Sunday, 7 June 2015

• Re: comments on DUV and some proposals Antoine Isaac

Friday, 5 June 2015

• Re: comments on DUV and some proposals Christophe Guéret
• RE: New DQV editor's draft: SLA Peter.Winstanley@scotland.gsi.gov.uk
• My comments on DUV Carlos Iglesias
• Re: comments on DUV and some proposals Eric Stephan
• Re: BPs on Data Identification Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• comments on DUV and some proposals João Paulo Almeida
• Re: Agenda for Friday - 5jun Annette Greiner

Wednesday, 3 June 2015

• Re: Agenda for Friday - 5jun Caroline Burle
• Re: data quality vocabulary - scope Antoine Isaac
• BPs on Data Identification Phil Archer
• Re: data quality vocabulary - scope Annette Greiner
• Re: New DQV editor's draft Christophe Guéret

Tuesday, 2 June 2015

• Re: data quality vocabulary - scope Antoine Isaac
• Re: data quality vocabulary - dimensions Antoine Isaac
• Re: New DQV editor's draft Antoine Isaac
• Agenda for Friday - 5jun yaso@nic.br

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2015 16:50:47 UTC