- From: Herbert Van de Sompel <hvdsomp@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:46:10 -0600
- To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Cc: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br>, Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <BE677102-5C3E-4E17-88D2-3006822697FA@gmail.com>
On Jun 11, 2015, at 16:03, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote: > > Hi Herbert, > > Thanks for the link! > > If I understood correctly, memento doesn't have a vocabulary to describe versions. We are looking for a way to describe (using metadata) that a dataset has one more versions, for example. > Memento TimeMaps, defined in RFC 7089, do this. They list versions. I think one needs to keep in mind that not all information interoperability needs to be solved by means of semantic technologies. There is a rather basic technology stack - URIs, HTTP links, IANA relation types - that can provide a nice level of interop too. IMO that is a rather important consideration for this effort to take into account. Betting all interop on sem technologies may limit the action radius because of the threshold involved in adoption. Cheers Herbert > cheers, > Bernadette > > 2015-06-11 18:22 GMT-03:00 Herbert Van de Sompel <hvdsomp@gmail.com>: >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio >> <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote: >> > Hi Phil, >> > >> > Thanks a lot for the updates on the document and the creation of new issues! >> > >> > I agree with you that some issues should be notes! I'm gonna be aware about >> > this from now on :) >> > >> > After our last meeting and Deirdre's comments about the Context section I've >> > been thinking about the relation between dataset versions and time series. >> >> Related to versions, pls see http://mementoweb.org/guide/howto/ >> >> cheers >> >> herbert >> >> >> > Do you suggest some reference to help me with this? >> > >> > Thanks again! >> > Bernadette >> > >> > >> > 2015-06-11 4:55 GMT-03:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> First of all, thanks for including the data identification section and >> >> cleaning it up. >> >> >> >> I've just spent a few minutes making some small amendments and have >> >> created a pull request. Changes offered: >> >> >> >> 1. Most controversially, I've added a link to the study I did on >> >> persistent URIs that is the source of the Dos and Dont's that you've used. >> >> >> >> 2. A couple of 'Issues' I've changed to 'Notes' as they are informative >> >> notes in the doc, rather than issues as such. >> >> >> >> 3. Where there are issues in the doc, I've made sure that they are linked >> >> to a =n issue in tracker. Where absent, I've created the issue in tracker. >> >> >> >> Merge at your discretion. >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> Phil. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> Phil Archer >> >> W3C Data Activity Lead >> >> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ >> >> >> >> http://philarcher.org >> >> +44 (0)7887 767755 >> >> @philarcher1 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Bernadette Farias Lóscio >> > Centro de Informática >> > Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> -- >> Herbert Van de Sompel >> Digital Library Research & Prototyping >> Los Alamos National Laboratory, Research Library >> http://public.lanl.gov/herbertv/ >> >> == > > > > -- > Bernadette Farias Lóscio > Centro de Informática > Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2015 23:46:48 UTC