Re: Minor changes suggested for BP

Hi Bernadette,

The one that seems to have most currency is this one
http://pav-ontology.github.io/pav/pav.rdf

I haven't studied it as carefully as I'd like but it's a good place to 
start.

Apologies for brevity, written in haste,

Phil.

On 11/06/2015 16:33, Bernadette Farias Lóscio wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Thanks a lot for the updates on the document and the creation of new issues!
>
> I agree with you that some issues should be notes! I'm gonna be aware about
> this from now on :)
>
> After our last meeting and Deirdre's comments about the Context section
> I've been thinking about the relation between dataset versions and time
> series. Do you suggest some reference to help me with this?
>
> Thanks again!
> Bernadette
>
>
> 2015-06-11 4:55 GMT-03:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> First of all, thanks for including the data identification section and
>> cleaning it up.
>>
>> I've just spent a few minutes making some small amendments and have
>> created a pull request. Changes offered:
>>
>> 1. Most controversially, I've added a link to the study I did on
>> persistent URIs that is the source of the Dos and Dont's that you've used.
>>
>> 2. A couple of 'Issues' I've changed to 'Notes' as they are informative
>> notes in the doc, rather than issues as such.
>>
>> 3. Where there are issues in the doc, I've made sure that they are linked
>> to a =n issue in tracker. Where absent, I've created the issue in tracker.
>>
>> Merge at your discretion.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Phil.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Phil Archer
>> W3C Data Activity Lead
>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>>
>> http://philarcher.org
>> +44 (0)7887 767755
>> @philarcher1
>>
>
>
>

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1

Received on Thursday, 11 June 2015 18:17:26 UTC