- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:29:32 -0700
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br>, Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br>, "glpappa@dcc.ufmg.br" <glpappa@dcc.ufmg.br>
Hm, I had never seen that enrichment document and didn't even realize it was in development. It gives a nice review of machine learning techniques with a focus on text analysis. Very interesting stuff, but I have a few concerns. My primary concern is that it defines data enrichment much too narrowly. Data enrichment is helpful for all kinds of data, not just "big data" (a term I would encourage us to avoid, as it is overused and highly ambiguous). It is useful in image data as well as text, and in structured as well as unstructured data. I think we need to beware of putting out content that is tangential to the subject of publishing data on the web. -Annette Sent from a keyboard-challenged device > On Jun 23, 2015, at 7:00 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > > I'm putting the DWBP doc through pubrules and, forgive me, I've just noticed that it links to the enrichment document. > > For those unfamiliar with this, see > http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/enrichment.html > > The WG may well decide to publish this - it certainly deserves attention and may well be published. However, we can't just include it as a separate Note without going through the usual process followed by other documents in the WG. > > For this week's publication I have therefore removed "... according to the suggestions described in Data Enrichment Technical Note" from the BP doc and the link to the enrichment doc. > > Let's put this on the agenda for a near future call. > > Phil. > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C Data Activity Lead > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 >
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2015 16:30:11 UTC