www-tag@w3.org from March 2009 by author

Anne van Kesteren

Re: HTML extensibility framework (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: HTML extensibility framework (Wednesday, 18 March)

ashok malhotra

Re: WS-Resource-Access FPWG (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: WS-Resource-Access FPWG (Wednesday, 25 March)

Ben Adida

our summary of the @rel Link-Type Header issue (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Bob Freund

Re: WS-Resource-Access FPWG (Thursday, 26 March)
WS-Resource-Access FPWG (Monday, 23 March)

Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

RE: Call for Papers "Identity and Reference in web-based Knowledge Representation" workshop (Monday, 9 March)
RE: What resource does this URL identify? - http://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/11f804dfae358bd9 (Monday, 2 March)

Chris Wilson

RE: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)

Cullen Jennings

Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Sunday, 8 March)

Dan Brickley

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Dan Connolly

"RHTTP and overview of other approaches" at IETF apparea meeting (HTTPSubstrate ISSUE-16) (Monday, 23 March)
'Web addresses in HTML 5' for review [IRIEverywhere-27 ISSUE-27] (Wednesday, 18 March)
RE: TAG Pending Review Action Items (Friday, 13 March)
Re: TAG Pending Review Action Items (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: Metadata survey (Tuesday, 10 March)

David Orchard

Re: "RHTTP and overview of other approaches" at IETF apparea meeting (HTTPSubstrate ISSUE-16) (Monday, 23 March)
Standards compliance of top 100 sites (Thursday, 5 March)
Another new Apple URI scheme: rdar (Tuesday, 3 March)

Dirk Balfanz

Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-hammer-discovery-02.txt (Thursday, 5 March)

Eran Hammer-Lahav

Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Thursday, 5 March)
RE: I-D Action:draft-hammer-discovery-02.txt (Thursday, 5 March)
RE: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Thursday, 5 March)
RE: Request for feedback: HTTP-based Resource Descriptor Discovery (Thursday, 5 March)
RE: Q (Sunday, 1 March)
RE: Q (Sunday, 1 March)
RE: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Sunday, 1 March)
RE: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Sunday, 1 March)

Geoffrey Sneddon

Re: 'Web addresses in HTML 5' for review [IRIEverywhere-27 ISSUE-27] (Thursday, 19 March)

Henri Sivonen

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Monday, 2 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

John Kemp

ACTION-234 (Monday, 23 March)
ACTION-238 (Monday, 23 March)
Draft minutes for the 12th March 2009 (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)

Jonas Sicking

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 7 March)

Jonathan Rees

Re: Metadata survey (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: TAG Pending Review Action Items (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: TAG Pending Review Action Items (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: Metadata survey (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: Metadata survey (Monday, 9 March)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: I-D Action:draft-hammer-discovery-02.txt (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: Request for feedback: HTTP-based Resource Descriptor Discovery (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: Request for feedback: HTTP-based Resource Descriptor Discovery (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Thursday, 5 March)

Julian Reschke

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Monday, 2 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Karl Dubost

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Larry Masinter

RE: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Sunday, 29 March)
RE: WS-Resource-Access FPWG (Thursday, 26 March)
RE: HTML extensibility framework (Wednesday, 18 March)
HTML extensibility framework (Wednesday, 18 March)
RE: TAG Pending Review Action Items (Saturday, 14 March)
RE: TAG Pending Review Action Items (Wednesday, 11 March)
RE: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 12 March 2009 (Wednesday, 11 March)
RE: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 12 March 2009 (Wednesday, 11 March)
ACTION-227 - metadata summary (Monday, 9 March)
cost/benefit analysis of new URI scheme vs overloading "host name" (Monday, 9 March)
Call for Papers "Identity and Reference in web-based Knowledge Representation" workshop (Sunday, 8 March)

Leif Halvard Silli

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Maciej Stachowiak

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Manu Sporny

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)

Mark Baker

Re: Another new Apple URI scheme: rdar (Tuesday, 3 March)

Mark Nottingham

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Martin Nally

RE: What resource does this URL identify? - http://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/11f804dfae358bd9 (Tuesday, 3 March)

Michael Hausenblas

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Agenda for W3C TAG teleconference of 2 April 2009 (CORRECTED) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Agenda for W3C TAG teleconference of 2 April 2009 (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document (Monday, 30 March)
Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: WS-Resource-Access FPWG (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: WS-Resource-Access FPWG (Wednesday, 25 March)
ISSUE-62: OPTIONS HTTP method for metadata (Wednesday, 25 March)
Agenda for TAG teleconference of 26 March 2009 (Wednesday, 25 March)
Summary of status of TAG issue xmlVersioning-41 (Tuesday, 24 March)
Pointers to TAG work on versioning formalism (Tuesday, 24 March)
Setting TAG Priorities - Next steps (Sunday, 22 March)
Setting TAG Priorities - Review of discussion and planning to date (Sunday, 22 March)
Re: 'Web addresses in HTML 5' for review [IRIEverywhere-27 ISSUE-27] (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: 'Web addresses in HTML 5' for review [IRIEverywhere-27 ISSUE-27] (Thursday, 19 March)
RE: TAG Pending Review Action Items (Friday, 13 March)
TAG weekly conference on 19 March 2009 is cancelled (Friday, 13 March)
Re: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 12 March 2009 (Wednesday, 11 March)
Agenda for TAG teleconference of 12 March 2009 (Wednesday, 11 March)
TAG Pending Review Action Items (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: Metadata survey (Monday, 9 March)
Re: Metadata survey (Monday, 9 March)
RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices (Monday, 9 March)
Re: our summary of the @rel Link-Type Header issue (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: HTML and XML (Thursday, 5 March)
RE: What resource does this URL identify? - http://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/11f804dfae358bd9 (Monday, 2 March)
Re: "Content-Type Processing Model" draft 9 Jan (ISSUE-24 contentTypeOverride-24) (Monday, 2 March)

Pat Hayes

Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Sunday, 1 March)

Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Friday, 6 March)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Thursday, 5 March)
The right kind of hammer for the particular kind of nail (uniform access to metadata descriptions) (Monday, 2 March)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Monday, 2 March)
Re: Q (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: Q (Sunday, 1 March)
Q (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Sunday, 1 March)

Philip Taylor

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Re: Metadata survey (Wednesday, 18 March)

Rob Sayre

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Roy T. Fielding

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Sam Ruby

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Simon Pieters

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Monday, 9 March)

Steven Pemberton

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Monday, 2 March)

T.V Raman

Using Content Negotiation to relate "data resources" to AJAX user interfaces (Monday, 2 March)

Taki Kamiya

RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices (Sunday, 1 March)

Tim Berners-Lee

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)

Xiaoshu Wang

Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Monday, 2 March)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Sunday, 1 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2009 22:19:03 UTC