W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2009

"RHTTP and overview of other approaches" at IETF apparea meeting (HTTPSubstrate ISSUE-16)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:57:53 -0700
Message-ID: <49C7CDA1.60505@w3.org>
To: Technical Architecture Group WG <www-tag@w3.org>
CC: public-ietf-w3c@w3.org
I'm in the IETF apparea meeting, enjoying these presentations
on BOSH, Bayeaux, WebSock, rHTTP,

10:00   Bidirectional HTTP: BOSH, Bayeux, COMET, WebSockets, rHTTP
                 Peter Saint-André, Salvatore Loreto, Greg Wilkins, 
and/or Mark Lentczner?
                 http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0124.html
                 http://svn.cometd.org/trunk/bayeux/bayeux.html
                 draft-hixie-thewebsocketprotocol-02.txt
                 draft-lentczner-rhttp-00
http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/74/apparea.html


I can't seem to find a pointer to this nice summary by Mark L.

mnot brought up BCP56...

peter@jabber.org: "On the use of HTTP as a Substrate"
peter@jabber.org: http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp56
  -- http://jabber.ietf.org/logs/apparea/2009-03-23.txt

which reminds me of TAG ISSUE-16 HTTPSubstrate-16, which
we recently estimated is all over but the crying, i.e. PENDINGREVIEW

   Should HTTP be used as a substrate protocol? Does W3C agree with RFC 
3205?
   http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/16

people are talking about a new mailing list... BOF deadlines... etc.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 23 March 2009 17:58:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:13 GMT