- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:48:45 -0700
- To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- CC: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, www-tag@w3.org, "'Bob Freund'" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
We can do that but the problem is that such notes fade into the noise and are ignored. But certainly worth considering. All the best, Ashok Larry Masinter wrote: > What about adding a note to the WS specs saying what the > reservations are? So that even if they publish stuff the > TAG origin might not like, we can limit the scope the damage? > > Larry > > > -----Original Message----- > From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > ashok malhotra > Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 4:58 PM > To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com > Cc: www-tag@w3.org; Bob Freund > Subject: Re: WS-Resource-Access FPWG > > Personally, I think we should just let this go. The TAG has bigger fish > to fry. > > If we do want to ask for something, we should ask WS-RA to define what > happens if you send > an http GET to the URI in an EPR. The answer should not be a 404 or a > SOAP message. > > All the best, Ashok > > > noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > >> I chatted with Bob a bit at the AC meeting this week. We all know that >> there have been some reservations on the part of individual TAG members >> about about aspects of either WS-RA itself, or the ways in which WS-RA >> uses technologies like WS-Addressing. In particular, I've heard concerns >> expressed about the extent to which WS-RA re-implements HTTP at a >> different level and the stack, and also the possibility that WS-RA might >> encourage the use of WSA reference parameters for identification. If the >> TAG does intend to raise such concerns against WS-RA formally, Bob >> requests that we do so earlier rather than later. >> >> So, I would appreciate it if other TAG members would let me know whether >> they wish to schedule discussion of such concerns. I will collect >> responses and, based on them, decide about discussion scheduling. If I >> get no such responses, I will (after doublechecking with the TAG) confirm >> to Bob that we do not currently expect to raise such issues against WS-RA. >> > > >> Thank you. >> >> Noah >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Noah Mendelsohn >> IBM Corporation >> One Rogers Street >> Cambridge, MA 02142 >> 1-617-693-4036 >> -------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> >> Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org >> 03/23/2009 04:27 PM >> >> To: www-tag@w3.org >> cc: public-ws-resource-access-comments@w3.org, (bcc: Noah >> Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) >> Subject: WS-Resource-Access FPWG >> >> >> Dear TAG >> The WS-Resource-Access working group, on 2009-03-17 published the FPWD >> of five specifications and has begun public review: >> WS-Transfer[1] >> WS-Resource-Transfer[2] >> WS-Eventing[3] >> WS-Enumeration[4] >> WS-Metadata-Exchange[5] >> >> Emails to all known groups in several organizations that may have an >> interest in these specifications will be sent in the near future. >> >> Prior to the start of the WS-Resource-Access working group, a TAG >> resolution[6] was published expressing concerns about several details >> of some of these specifications, especially WS-Transfer. Since the >> WG is now under way, and on a tight nominal schedule, it would benefit >> all involved if issues that might arise from your review were to be >> created earlier rather than later. It is my hope that all issues that >> might be raised against fundamental aspects of any of these >> specifications be created before Last Call if at all possible. >> To that end, would the TAG please respond with specific issues of >> concern that in the opinion of the TAG need to be resolved in these >> specifications at its earliest convenience. >> In any case, a response with issues, or a statement of no-issues would >> be appreciated. >> >> thanks >> Bob Freund >> Chair, WS-Resource-Access Working Group >> >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-transfer-20090317/ >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-resource-transfer-20090317/ >> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-eventing-20090317/ >> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-enumeration-20090317/ >> [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-metadata-exchange-20090317/ >> [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Nov/0008.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 14:51:24 UTC