W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2009

Re: WS-Resource-Access FPWG

From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:48:45 -0700
Message-ID: <49CB95CD.5050403@oracle.com>
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
CC: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, www-tag@w3.org, "'Bob Freund'" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
We can do that but the problem is that such notes fade into the noise 
and are ignored.
But certainly worth considering.
All the best, Ashok


Larry Masinter wrote:
> What about adding a note to the WS specs saying what the
> reservations are? So that even if they publish stuff the
> TAG origin might not like, we can limit the scope the damage?
>
> Larry
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
> ashok malhotra
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 4:58 PM
> To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
> Cc: www-tag@w3.org; Bob Freund
> Subject: Re: WS-Resource-Access FPWG
>
> Personally, I think we should just let this go.  The TAG has bigger fish 
> to fry.
>
> If we do want to ask for something, we should ask WS-RA to define what 
> happens if you send
> an http GET to the URI in an EPR.  The answer should not be a 404 or a 
> SOAP message.
>
> All the best, Ashok
>
>
> noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
>   
>> I chatted with Bob a bit at the AC meeting this week.   We all know that 
>> there have been some reservations on the part of individual TAG members 
>> about about aspects of either WS-RA itself, or the ways in which WS-RA 
>> uses technologies like WS-Addressing.  In particular, I've heard concerns 
>> expressed about the extent to which WS-RA re-implements HTTP at a 
>> different level and the stack, and also the possibility that WS-RA might 
>> encourage the use of WSA reference parameters for identification.  If the 
>> TAG does intend to raise such concerns against WS-RA formally, Bob 
>> requests that we do so earlier rather than later.
>>
>> So, I would appreciate it if other TAG members would let me know whether 
>> they wish to schedule discussion of such concerns.  I will collect 
>> responses and, based on them, decide about discussion scheduling.   If I 
>> get no such responses, I will (after doublechecking with the TAG) confirm 
>> to Bob that we do not currently expect to raise such issues against WS-RA.
>>     
>
>   
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Noah
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Noah Mendelsohn 
>> IBM Corporation
>> One Rogers Street
>> Cambridge, MA 02142
>> 1-617-693-4036
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
>> Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
>> 03/23/2009 04:27 PM
>>  
>>         To:     www-tag@w3.org
>>         cc:     public-ws-resource-access-comments@w3.org, (bcc: Noah 
>> Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
>>         Subject:        WS-Resource-Access FPWG
>>
>>
>> Dear TAG
>> The WS-Resource-Access working group, on 2009-03-17 published the FPWD 
>> of five specifications and has begun public review:
>> WS-Transfer[1]
>> WS-Resource-Transfer[2]
>> WS-Eventing[3]
>> WS-Enumeration[4]
>> WS-Metadata-Exchange[5]
>>
>> Emails to all known groups in several organizations that may have an 
>> interest in these specifications will be sent in the near future.
>>
>> Prior to the start of the WS-Resource-Access working group, a TAG 
>> resolution[6] was published expressing concerns about several details 
>> of some of these specifications, especially WS-Transfer.   Since the 
>> WG is now under way, and on a tight nominal schedule, it would benefit 
>> all involved if issues that might arise from your review were to be 
>> created earlier rather than later.  It is my hope that all issues that 
>> might be raised against fundamental aspects of any of these 
>> specifications be created before Last Call if at all possible.
>> To that end, would the TAG please respond with specific issues of 
>> concern that in the opinion of the TAG need to be resolved in these 
>> specifications at its earliest convenience.
>> In any case, a response with issues, or a statement of no-issues would 
>> be appreciated.
>>
>> thanks
>> Bob Freund
>> Chair, WS-Resource-Access Working Group
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-transfer-20090317/
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-resource-transfer-20090317/
>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-eventing-20090317/
>> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-enumeration-20090317/
>> [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ws-metadata-exchange-20090317/
>> [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Nov/0008.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
>   
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 14:51:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:13 GMT