W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2009

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:27:24 -0800
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Message-id: <96E9FFC8-31AC-4948-BEA3-AB194A88DBA7@apple.com>
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>

On Mar 1, 2009, at 8:36 AM, Ben Adida wrote:

> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> The transformation *result* is RDF data. It doesn't tell you how to
>> interpret parts of the source.
>
> No, sorry, I believe that's *exactly* what it tells you. When you're
> writing HTML with GRDDL (or with eRDF, which has the same indirection
> property), you're saying "this is how to interpret my value of @rel."

Microformat-defined rel and class values have their usual semantics  
regardless of whether one links a GRDDL transform converting them to  
RDF.

Regards,
Maciej
Received on Sunday, 1 March 2009 19:28:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:13 GMT