W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2009

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

From: John Kemp <john.kemp@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:19:37 -0800
Message-ID: <49B0C079.7050905@nokia.com>
To: ext Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: Rob Sayre <rsayre@mozilla.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "public-xhtml2@w3.org" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com> 
ext Sam Ruby wrote:
> +cc: Chris Wilson
> 
> Rob Sayre wrote:
>> The biggest problem is that HTML parsers must reparent elements. This
>> would make discerning in-scope namespaces difficult.
> 
> This argument doesn't resonate with me.  If properly spec'ed

[...]

and

>>> Separately, xmlns forbids elements with undeclared prefixes.

Would Exclusive XML C14N help?

http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-exc-c14n/

- johnk
Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 06:21:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:56:25 GMT