W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2009

RE: TAG Pending Review Action Items

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:41:25 -0700
To: "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8B62A039C620904E92F1233570534C9B0118C8825FA9@nambx04.corp.adobe.com>
Reviewing all the Pending Review action items, I have questions mainly around what follow-on actions should be taken, where there is no ISSUE or the issue has no appropriate next steps. It's likely that my questions can be answered in email, so it isn't clear meeting time is necessary. I'm OK closing all the ones not mentioned below:

* ACTION-165 Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document
The last message I can find on this topic indicates significant disagreement. So I'm not sure where that leads after this action. What are next steps on the issue, if any?

* ACTION-193 Try to draft a blog posting adapted from http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/hash-in-url, with help from TVR
It looks like the result of this action was "inspiration hasn't struck" which seems a bit lame. The underlying issue has no follow-on actions. The "hash-in-url" document looks interesting, relevant to ongoing W3C work. Should there be some follow-on action, e.g., asking affected W3C working groups or others to review the draft document? 

(And "draft a blog posting" didn't come up when we discussed possible ways the TAG could  make information available and create lasting artifacts.)

* ACTION-227 Summarize TAG work on metadata, with Larry
While Jonathan has done this action (great job, no help from me), I don't see a follow-on ACTION or associated ISSUE. It's on our agenda, but I suggest leaving the ACTION open until we've decided what to do next.

* ACTION-221 Work with Dave Orchard to close up the formalism facet  of the versioning document, due in two weeks
Again, I think there are related topics on the agenda, but I'm not sure what the plan is for wrapping up the current round of versioning work.


-----Original Message-----
From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 5:26 PM
To: www-tag@w3.org
Subject: TAG Pending Review Action Items

Often on teleconferences we attempt to close by "voice vote"  action items 
that are marked PENDING REVIEW, I.e. those that the person responsible 
believes are completed.  I was preparing to do the same on Thursday's 
call, but when I pulled up the list at [1] it seemed unusually long.  To 
avoid spending a lot of time on the call, I'm suggesting an alternative 
procedure for this week:  please look at the list now.  If there are any 
that you don't give me as chair permission to close or not at my 
discretion, then let me know and we'll either resolve via email or discuss 
just those on Thursday.  So, silence is assent to my doing what I think 
best, which in most cases will be to close.

As a placeholder, I'll put an item on the agenda referencing this note, 
but I'm hoping to be able to pass by it without spending significant time. 
 

A somewhat rough text version of the list is attached.

Noah

[1]  http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------

Technical Architecture Group Issue Tracking


   Generated by [21]Tracker
   - Version 1.10

     [21] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/

Pending review Actions

   There are 11 pending review actions.

   [_] [25]ACTION-165[26] (edit) pending review [27]Formulate erratum text 
on versioning for the web architecture document John Kemp  2009-02-24 
[28]XMLVersioning-41

   [_] [29]ACTION-176[30] (edit) pending review [31]send comments on exi 
w.r.t. evaluation and efficiency Noah Mendelsohn 2009-03-02 
[32]binaryXML-30

   [_] [33]ACTION-193[34] (edit) pending review [35]Try to draft a blog 
posting adapted from http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/hash-in-url, with help 
from TVR Dan Connolly 2009-02-25[36]webApplicationState-60

   [_] [37]ACTION-200[38] (edit) pending review [39]Revise "Uniform Access 
to Metadata" (needs title change) to add XRD use case
   Jonathan Rees 2009-02-24 [40]HttpRedirections-57

   [_] [41]ACTION-205[42] (edit) pending review [43]Henry to begin 
responding to Marcos asking the question: Why does the spec not say "A 
conforming spec MUST recommend a hierarchical adressing schems that can be 
used to address the individual resources within a widget resource from 
within a config doc, widget, or other constituent of the same widget pkg." 
Henry S. Thompson 2009-01-15 [44]WebApps access control requirements 
review

   [_] [45]ACTION-213[46] (edit) pending review [47]Convene weekly 
teleconference, take roll (regrets: Tim), review agenda Noah
   Mendelsohn 2009-01-01 [48]ultimateQuestion-42 

   [_] [49]ACTION-215[50] (edit) pending review [51]Announce minutes of 19 
Feb TAG teleconference Ashok Malhotra 2009-02-23 [52]ultimateQuestion-42

   [_] [53]ACTION-217[54] (edit) pending review [55]Raise moving the 
registry to w3.org with Mark Nottingham Jonathan Rees 2009-02-24 
[56]HttpRedirections-57

   [_] [57]ACTION-221[58] (edit) pending review [59]Work with Dave Orchard 
to close up the formalism facet of the versioning document, due in two 
weeks Jonathan Rees 2009-02-24 [60]XMLVersioning-41

   [_] [61]ACTION-227[62] (edit) pending review [63]Summarize TAG work on 
metadata, with Larry Jonathan Rees 2009-02-24

   [_] [64]ACTION-230[65] (edit) pending review [66]Get Noah to look at 
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34786/TPAC2009/ Dan Connolly
   2009-03-09


References:

     [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/?sort=status
     [23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/?sort=owner
     [24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/?sort=due
     [25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/165
     [26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/165/edit
     [27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/165
     [28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/41
     [29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/176
     [30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/176/edit
     [31] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/176
     [32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/30
     [33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/193
     [34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/193/edit
     [35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/193
     [36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/60
     [37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/200
     [38] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/200/edit
     [39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/200
     [40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/57
     [41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/205
     [42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/205/edit
     [43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/205
     [44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/products/2
     [45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/213
     [46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/213/edit
     [47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/213
     [48] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/42
     [49] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/215
     [50] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/215/edit
     [51] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/215
     [52] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/42
     [53] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/217
     [54] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/217/edit
     [55] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/217
     [56] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/57
     [57] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/221
     [58] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/221/edit
     [59] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/221
     [60] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/41
     [61] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/227
     [62] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/227/edit
     [63] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/227
     [64] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/230
     [65] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/230/edit
     [66] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/230
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 15:42:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:13 GMT