Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel from Ben Adida on 2009-03-01 (www-tag@w3.org from March 2009)

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 08:22:02 -0800
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Message-ID: <49AAB62A.3080002@adida.net>

Julian Reschke wrote:
> The linked transformation doesn't tell you how to interpret relation
> value at all. Instead, it transforms the content to RDF/XML.

And what does the RDF/XML tell you, if not how to interpret the @rel
value? After all, this is how folks wish to interpret microformats and
their use of @class and @rel.

-Ben

Received on Sunday, 1 March 2009 16:22:45 UTC