W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2009

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:32:10 +0100
Message-ID: <49AAB88A.1070809@gmx.de>
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Ben Adida wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> The linked transformation doesn't tell you how to interpret relation
>> value at all. Instead, it transforms the content to RDF/XML.
> 
> And what does the RDF/XML tell you, if not how to interpret the @rel
> value? After all, this is how folks wish to interpret microformats and
> their use of @class and @rel.

The transformation *result* is RDF data. It doesn't tell you how to 
interpret parts of the source.

The transformation *code* (the XSLT) can indeed tell you how to 
interpret rel values (if you understand XSLT).

BR, Julian
Received on Sunday, 1 March 2009 16:32:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:13 GMT