W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2009

Re: TAG Pending Review Action Items

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:30:17 -0500
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Cc: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1236796217.7868.1043.camel@pav.lan>
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 11:44 -0400, Jonathan Rees wrote:
> If anyone can nominate an action for closure that may reduce the brief- 
> rationale-writing load on the chair. The procedure would then be: (1)  
> send request-to-close email with rationale, (2) let two days pass, (3)  
> take silence at TAG meeting (perhaps for an entire batch) as assent to  
> close.

This seems like overkill, to me.

I think the process should be: if you want to close an action or
do anything else in the TAG tracker short of closing an issue,
(a) consult with at least one other TAG member, preferably
the chair, and then (b) do it, leaving as much of an audit trail
as is convenient/feasible.

I'm OK with (b) coming after (a) in some cases.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 18:30:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:01 UTC