public-wsc-wg@w3.org from January 2008 by author

Anil Saldhana

ACTION-334: Propose language on Bookmarks API (Saturday, 26 January)
Re: IE Favorites Feature May Allow Phishing (Saturday, 26 January)
Open Issues added to xit (Tuesday, 22 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: ISSUE-131 (Code outside browser): Executing code outside of browser in 8.3.2.3 is vague / scary [All] (Wednesday, 2 January)
Re: ISSUE-131 (Code outside browser): Executing code outside of browser in 8.3.2.3 is vague / scary [All] (Wednesday, 2 January)

Close, Tyler J.

RE: ISSUE-127: Safe Form Bar: Separate MITM handling? [Techniques] (Tuesday, 8 January)
RE: ISSUE-127: Safe Form Bar: Separate MITM handling? [Techniques] (Monday, 7 January)
RE: ISSUE-127: Safe Form Bar: Separate MITM handling? [Techniques] (Monday, 7 January)
RE: wsc-xit review (Thursday, 3 January)
wsc-xit review (Thursday, 3 January)

Dan Schutzer

RE: Agenda: WSC WG weekly 2008-01-30 (Tuesday, 29 January)
RE: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Thursday, 24 January)
RE: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-01-23 (Wednesday, 23 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Monday, 14 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Monday, 14 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: TLS/SSL robustness - high, medium, low (Tuesday, 8 January)

Doyle, Bill

RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
RE: ISSUE-161: Be clearer about security indicator images [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 9 January)
meeting conflict - only available for first 1/2 hour (Wednesday, 9 January)
RE: TLS/SSL robustness - high, medium, low (Tuesday, 8 January)
TLS/SSL robustness - high, medium, low (Tuesday, 8 January)

Hal Lockhart

Regrets for Jan-30 call (Tuesday, 29 January)

Hallam-Baker, Phillip

RE: ACTION-340 OPEN Gather data about cost of TLS deployment Phillip Hallam-Baker 2007-12-10 (Friday, 4 January)

Ian Fette

Re: ACTION-380: Text for ISSUE-131 (Thursday, 31 January)
Re: Troubles with KCM (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: ACTION-356: picture-in-picture attacks (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: ACTION-372: Proposed replacement for 7.6 (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: ACTION-369: webarch implications of 7.2 (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-01-16 (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: ISSUE-161: Be clearer about security indicator images [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 9 January)
Re: May f2f plans - query on joint meeting with CABForum (Tuesday, 8 January)
Re: TLS/SSL robustness - high, medium, low (Tuesday, 8 January)
Re: ISSUE-127: Safe Form Bar: Separate MITM handling? [Techniques] (Monday, 7 January)
Re: ISSUE-127: Safe Form Bar: Separate MITM handling? [Techniques] (Monday, 7 January)
Re: ISSUE-161: Be clearer about security indicator images [wsc-xit] (Saturday, 5 January)
Re: ISSUE-131 (Code outside browser): Executing code outside of browser in 8.3.2.3 is vague / scary [All] (Wednesday, 2 January)
Re: ISSUE-131 (Code outside browser): Executing code outside of browser in 8.3.2.3 is vague / scary [All] (Wednesday, 2 January)
Re: usecases comments Re: Comments on draft documents posted to the WSC wiki (Wednesday, 2 January)
Re: usecases comments Re: Comments on draft documents posted to the WSC wiki (Wednesday, 2 January)

Johnathan Nightingale

Re: Agenda: WSC WG weekly 2008-01-30 (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: Form editor question (Friday, 18 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: May f2f plans - query on joint meeting with CABForum (Wednesday, 9 January)
Re: ISSUE-167: Should Section 5.3.1 specify normative details for a theoretical technology? (Monday, 7 January)
ACTION-353: Convert Mozilla FPWD review notes into issues (Monday, 7 January)
Re: ISSUE-169: Section 5.5.3 creates a burden on browsers to remember past certificates (Monday, 7 January)

Mary Ellen Zurko

ACTION-373 Poll al G about shoulder surfing attacks in context of assistive technologies (Friday, 25 January)
RE: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Wednesday, 23 January)
How to write a good issue (Wednesday, 23 January)
Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-01-23 (Tuesday, 22 January)
call for demos for the f2f (Friday, 18 January)
wsc-xit next steps (Friday, 18 January)
WSC Open Action Items (Friday, 18 January)
Re: ACTION-336 OPEN Propose material for ISSUE-106 Stephen Farrell 2007-12-21 (Friday, 18 January)
Re: ACTION-344, ISSUE-120: Proposed normative material on audio logotypes (Wednesday, 16 January)
Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-01-16 (Tuesday, 15 January)
Fw: A review of Web Security Context's Scope and Use Cases -- Last Call (Monday, 14 January)
WSC Open Action Items (Friday, 11 January)
Re: ACTION-362 OPEN review wsc-xit William Eburn 2008-01-01 (Friday, 11 January)
Re: ACTION-361 OPEN review wsc-xit Phillip Hallam-Baker 2008-01-01 (Friday, 11 January)
Re: ACTION-343 OPEN Begin examining some of the recommendations, write down the underlying assumptions for success, then list any prior studies that have already examined those assumptions, and possibly how to test the untested assumptions Serge Egelman 2007-12-21 User Studies (Friday, 11 January)
Re: ACTION-336 OPEN Propose material for ISSUE-106 Stephen Farrell 2007-12-21 (Friday, 11 January)
RE: ACTION-214 solicit commentary on Threat Trees from MITRE INFOSEC community Bill Doyle (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
May f2f plans - query on joint meeting with CABForum (Tuesday, 8 January)
RE: ISSUE-127: Safe Form Bar: Separate MITM handling? [Techniques] (Tuesday, 8 January)
Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-01-09 (Tuesday, 8 January)
RE: ISSUE-127: Safe Form Bar: Separate MITM handling? [Techniques] (Monday, 7 January)
Re: ISSUE-167: Should Section 5.3.1 specify normative details for a theoretical technology? (Monday, 7 January)
Re: ISSUE-127: Safe Form Bar: Separate MITM handling? [Techniques] (Friday, 4 January)
WSC Open Action Items (Friday, 4 January)
Re: ACTION-345 OPEN Begin designing lo-fi user study for Browser Lockdown Maritza Johnson 2007-11-30 (Friday, 4 January)
Re: ACTION-340 OPEN Gather data about cost of TLS deployment Phillip Hallam-Baker 2007-12-10 (Friday, 4 January)
Re: wsc-xit review (Thursday, 3 January)
Re: wsc-usecases comments Re: Comments on draft documents posted to the WSC wiki (Wednesday, 2 January)
Re: wsc-xit review (Wednesday, 2 January)
Re: usecases comments Re: Comments on draft documents posted to the WSC wiki (Wednesday, 2 January)

Michael Versace

RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
RE: TLS/SSL robustness - high, medium, low (Tuesday, 8 January)

michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com

RE: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Thursday, 24 January)
RE: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Thursday, 24 January)
RE: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Wednesday, 23 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: TLS/SSL robustness - high, medium, low (Tuesday, 8 January)
RE: ISSUE-161: Be clearer about security indicator images [wsc-xit] (Tuesday, 8 January)

Mike Beltzner

Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: ISSUE-170: 6.3 Seems more like extension/experimentation than standardization [wsc-xit] (Monday, 7 January)
Re: ISSUE-131 (Code outside browser): Executing code outside of browser in 8.3.2.3 is vague / scary [All] (Wednesday, 2 January)

Rachna Dhamija

WSC-XIT review (Monday, 21 January)

Robert Yonaitis

RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Monday, 14 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
FW: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)

Serge Egelman

Re: Agenda: WSC WG weekly 2008-01-30 (Wednesday, 30 January)
Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: Troubles with KCM (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-01-16 (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: ISSUE-161: Be clearer about security indicator images [wsc-xit] (Sunday, 6 January)
Re: ISSUE-161: Be clearer about security indicator images [wsc-xit] (Saturday, 5 January)

Stephen Farrell

Re: Troubles with KCM (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: Form editor question (Friday, 18 January)
Form editor question (Friday, 18 January)
Re: TLS/SSL robustness - high, medium, low (Tuesday, 8 January)
Re: wsc-xit review (Wednesday, 2 January)
wsc-xit review (Tuesday, 1 January)

Thomas Roessler

Re: ACTION-380: Text for ISSUE-131 (Thursday, 31 January)
ACTION-381: ISSUE-130 (consistent across devices) done (Thursday, 31 January)
ACTION-380: Text for ISSUE-131 (Thursday, 31 January)
Please review ACTION-367 results (Wednesday, 30 January)
ACTION-360: Mez's editorial nits; petnames in identity signal? (Wednesday, 30 January)
Agenda: WSC WG weekly 2008-01-30 (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: ACTION-334: Propose language on Bookmarks API (Saturday, 26 January)
Meeting record: WSC WG weekly 2008-01-16 (Wednesday, 23 January)
ACTION-377: Hook for UIs in seciton 7.8 (Wednesday, 23 January)
Troubles with KCM (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: ACTION-356: picture-in-picture attacks (Friday, 18 January)
Re: ACTION-372: Proposed replacement for 7.6 (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: ACTION-369: webarch implications of 7.2 (Thursday, 17 January)
ACTION-369: webarch implications of 7.2 (Thursday, 17 January)
ACTION-356: picture-in-picture attacks (Thursday, 17 January)
ACTION-317: Different notions of KCM in different parts of the document (Thursday, 17 January)
ACTION-372: Proposed replacement for 7.6 (Thursday, 17 January)
ACTION-357: less conspicuous hovering effects (Thursday, 17 January)
Meeting record: WSC WG weekly 2008-01-09 (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Sunday, 13 January)
Meeting record: WSC WG weekly 2007-12-19 (Friday, 11 January)

Timothy Hahn

weekly call on 30 January (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Wednesday, 23 January)
ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-01-23 (Wednesday, 23 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: ISSUE-170: 6.3 Seems more like extension/experimentation than standardization [wsc-xit] (Monday, 7 January)
Re: ISSUE-142: Page Security Score does not yet have enough content behind it [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)

Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker

ISSUE-181: Should there be an authoring practice suggesting http/https URI space consistency [wsc-xit] (Thursday, 17 January)
ISSUE-180 (wsc-xit spelling mistakes ): wsc-xit spelling mistakes (public comment) [wsc-xit] (Monday, 14 January)
ISSUE-179 (wsc-xit comment section 10.2.3): general comment section 10.2.3 (public comment) [wsc-xit] (Monday, 14 January)
ISSUE-178 (wsc-xit comment section 10.2.2): general comment section 10.2.2 conceptual model (public comment) [wsc-xit] (Monday, 14 January)
ISSUE-177 (wsc-xit comment section 6.5 tls/ssl pt2): general comment section 6.5 tls/ssl pt2 (public comment) [wsc-xit] (Monday, 14 January)
ISSUE-176 (wsc-xit comment section 6.5 tls/ssl): general comment section 6.5 tls/ssl processing (public comment) [wsc-xit] (Monday, 14 January)
ISSUE-175 (wsc-xit comment section 6.5): general comment section 6.5 table and bullet list (public comment) [wsc-xit] (Monday, 14 January)
ISSUE-174 (5.4 wsc-xit comments): review wsc-xit - general comments section 5.4 (public comment) [wsc-xit] (Monday, 14 January)
ISSUE-173: 8.1.1 Requires user testing for the purposes of conformance [wsc-xit] (Monday, 7 January)
ISSUE-172: 7.9 Normative text assumes a service we don't otherwise mention or expect to exist [wsc-xit] (Monday, 7 January)
ISSUE-171: 7.8 Is unclear about data retention requirements [wsc-xit] (Monday, 7 January)
ISSUE-170: 6.3 Seems more like extension/experimentation than standardization [wsc-xit] (Monday, 7 January)
ISSUE-169: Section 5.5.3 creates a burden on browsers to remember past certificates (Monday, 7 January)
ISSUE-168: Section 5.5.2 might be over-restrictive, especially on first-visit-redirect [wsc-xit] (Monday, 7 January)
ISSUE-167: Should Section 5.3.1 specify normative details for a theoretical technology? (Monday, 7 January)
ISSUE-166: Consider dropping section 5.2 in favour of "standard" matching algo, if appropriate. (Monday, 7 January)
ISSUE-165: Allow for (non default) configuration of notification of first time TLS interaction with a site [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-164: SSC != CoSL [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-163: Make (sure) 9.4 is internally consistent [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-162: Recognize there are other forms of network security [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-161: Be clearer about security indicator images [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-160: Remove section 7.9 [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-159: Merge 7.8 into 8.2 [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-158: Abstracting and tightening editing of stored history [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-157: Masking only MUST for passwords [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-156: Tighten and abstract seleting the text string [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-155: Remove references to contacts option [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-154: Provide unique labels for each message and use them consistently as references [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-153: Tie SWFE to secondary SCI [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-152: Clarify the point of "distinguishing" between static and other text in messages [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-151: Make "similar" clearer (in choosing petnames) [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-150: Abstract how user navigates to a site for establishing a new relationship (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-149: Condense 7.2 to its first normative directive only [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-148: Downgrade ability to update an organization's name and address to SHOULD [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-147: Descriptions of certificate matching rules in SWFE need explanations somewhere [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)
ISSUE-146: 7.1 to reference where xit talks about how identity is presented [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 2 January)

William Eburn

RE: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (Thursday, 24 January)
WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-01-16 (Wednesday, 16 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Friday, 11 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is the padlock a page security score? (Thursday, 10 January)

Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen

» Even SSL Gmail can get sidejacked | Zero Day | ZDNet.com (Thursday, 31 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:10:44 UTC