ISSUE-160 makes the same basic proposal, perhaps for the same basic reasons, but I'm leaving both open and cross referenced, in case the resolutions of the underlying issues turn out to be different. I agree that there should be only one place this is discussed. And from the logic of the document, it is in other places. If there is something in section 7 that should inform those other places, proposals for changes to those other places should be made. I'll give other folks a little more time on this issue to discuss, then do a straw poll of any concrete proposals on the table (so far there is one, to remove 7.9, but I'm certain there could be others that respond to the issues raised). http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/127 http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/160 MezReceived on Friday, 4 January 2008 14:59:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:52:56 GMT