public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from August 2009 by author

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Saturday, 1 August)

Ben Adida

• Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 August 2009, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 27 August)
• Telecon Agenda- 20 August 2009, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 20 August)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC (Thursday, 6 August)
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Monday, 3 August)

Benjamin Nowack

• typo in RDFa test case 122 (I think) (Thursday, 20 August)
• Re: microdata feedback / Was: Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 14 August)
• more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
• microdata feedback / Was: Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers (Thursday, 6 August)

Damian Steer

• Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens? (Wednesday, 26 August)

Dan Brickley

• Re: microdata feedback / Was: Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 14 August)

Danny Ayers

• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Sunday, 16 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)

dorian taylor

• Suggestions for RDFa 1.1 (Saturday, 1 August)

Ed Summers

• Re: RDFa usage for SKOS applications (Monday, 24 August)

Edward O'Connor

• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)

Elias Torres

• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)

Hausenblas, Michael

• Re: Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers (Thursday, 6 August)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Sunday, 16 August)
• Re: microdata feedback (Sunday, 16 August)
• Re: microdata feedback / Was: Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 14 August)
• Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Saturday, 8 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: [whatwg] Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
• Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Saturday, 1 August)

Ivan Herman

• RDFa usage for SKOS applications (Monday, 24 August)
• Re: Loading tokens via @profile and XMLHttpRequest issues (Tuesday, 18 August)

Joe D Williams

• Re: New HTML5 spec-editing tools released (Monday, 3 August)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: [whatwg] Microdata Revisited (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Wednesday, 5 August)

Julian Reschke

• Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Loading tokens via @profile and XMLHttpRequest issues (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Saturday, 1 August)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Saturday, 1 August)

Manu Sporny

• Minutes for RDFa Telecon (August 27th, 2009) (Monday, 31 August)
• Re: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 August 2009, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 27 August)
• RDFa telecon minutes for August 20th, 2009 (Thursday, 20 August)
• Re: Telecon Agenda- 20 August 2009, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 20 August)
• Re: microdata feedback (Friday, 14 August)
• RDFa telecon minutes for August, 13th, 2009 (Friday, 14 August)
• Re: microdata feedback (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: Possible RDFa errata - 4.1 Document Conformance (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Minutes for August 6th, 2009 telecon (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers (Thursday, 6 August)
• Loading tokens via @profile and XMLHttpRequest issues (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: New HTML5 spec-editing tools released (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Tuesday, 4 August)
• New HTML5 spec-editing tools released (Monday, 3 August)

Mark Birbeck

• Re: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 August 2009, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 27 August)
• Possible errata: Initialising the prefix mappings (Saturday, 15 August)

Martin Hepp (UniBW)

• ANN: RDF2RDFa: Turning RDF/XML into Snippets for Copy-and-Paste (Thursday, 13 August)

Martin McEvoy

• Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
• The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Saturday, 8 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Microdata Revisited (Monday, 3 August)

Michael Hausenblas

• Re: typo in RDFa test case 122 (I think) (Friday, 21 August)
• Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC (Thursday, 6 August)

Philip Taylor

• Re: microdata feedback (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)

Ralph R. Swick

• regrets [Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC] (Thursday, 13 August)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens? (Thursday, 27 August)
• Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens? (Thursday, 27 August)

Sam Ruby

• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)

Shane McCarron

• Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens? (Thursday, 27 August)
• Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens? (Thursday, 27 August)
• XHTML+RDFa 1.1 and @lang (Wednesday, 19 August)
• Regrets for Thursday, 20 August (Wednesday, 19 August)
• Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)

Shelley Powers

• Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Saturday, 1 August)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 August 2009, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 27 August)
• ODF Not Implicated In i4i Suit "thanks to RDFa" (Monday, 17 August)

Toby A Inkster

• HTML5 already includes RDFa (Monday, 17 August)
• Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)

Toby Inkster

• Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens? (Thursday, 27 August)
• Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens? (Thursday, 27 August)
• Re: RDFa usage for SKOS applications (Monday, 24 August)
• http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#itsRules (Friday, 21 August)
• Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)

Last message date: Monday, 31 August 2009 14:23:14 UTC