W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > August 2009

public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from August 2009 by author

Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Saturday, 1 August)
Ben Adida
- Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 August 2009, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 27 August)
- Telecon Agenda- 20 August 2009, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 20 August)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC (Thursday, 6 August)
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Monday, 3 August)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Monday, 3 August)
Benjamin Nowack
- typo in RDFa test case 122 (I think) (Thursday, 20 August)
- Re: microdata feedback / Was: Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 14 August)
- more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
- microdata feedback / Was: Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers (Thursday, 6 August)
Damian Steer
- Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens? (Wednesday, 26 August)
Dan Brickley
- Re: microdata feedback / Was: Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 14 August)
Danny Ayers
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Sunday, 16 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
dorian taylor
- Suggestions for RDFa 1.1 (Saturday, 1 August)
Ed Summers
- Re: RDFa usage for SKOS applications (Monday, 24 August)
Edward O'Connor
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
Elias Torres
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
Hausenblas, Michael
- Re: Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers (Thursday, 6 August)
Ian Hickson
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Sunday, 16 August)
- Re: microdata feedback (Sunday, 16 August)
- Re: microdata feedback / Was: Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 14 August)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Saturday, 8 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: [whatwg] Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
- Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Saturday, 1 August)
Ivan Herman
- RDFa usage for SKOS applications (Monday, 24 August)
- Re: Loading tokens via @profile and XMLHttpRequest issues (Tuesday, 18 August)
Joe D Williams
- Re: New HTML5 spec-editing tools released (Monday, 3 August)
Jonas Sicking
- Re: [whatwg] Microdata Revisited (Friday, 7 August)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Wednesday, 5 August)
Julian Reschke
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Re: Loading tokens via @profile and XMLHttpRequest issues (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Saturday, 1 August)
Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Saturday, 1 August)
Manu Sporny
- Minutes for RDFa Telecon (August 27th, 2009) (Monday, 31 August)
- Re: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 August 2009, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 27 August)
- RDFa telecon minutes for August 20th, 2009 (Thursday, 20 August)
- Re: Telecon Agenda- 20 August 2009, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 20 August)
- Re: microdata feedback (Friday, 14 August)
- RDFa telecon minutes for August, 13th, 2009 (Friday, 14 August)
- Re: microdata feedback (Thursday, 13 August)
- Re: Possible RDFa errata - 4.1 Document Conformance (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Minutes for August 6th, 2009 telecon (Tuesday, 11 August)
- Test results for xmlns:foo attribute preservation across all browsers (Thursday, 6 August)
- Loading tokens via @profile and XMLHttpRequest issues (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: New HTML5 spec-editing tools released (Tuesday, 4 August)
- Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Tuesday, 4 August)
- New HTML5 spec-editing tools released (Monday, 3 August)
Mark Birbeck
- Re: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 August 2009, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 27 August)
- Possible errata: Initialising the prefix mappings (Saturday, 15 August)
Martin Hepp (UniBW)
- ANN: RDF2RDFa: Turning RDF/XML into Snippets for Copy-and-Paste (Thursday, 13 August)
Martin McEvoy
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
- The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Tuesday, 11 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Saturday, 8 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Thursday, 6 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Tuesday, 4 August)
- Microdata Revisited (Monday, 3 August)
Michael Hausenblas
- Re: typo in RDFa test case 122 (I think) (Friday, 21 August)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC (Thursday, 6 August)
Philip Taylor
- Re: microdata feedback (Thursday, 13 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
Ralph R. Swick
- regrets [Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1500 UTC] (Thursday, 13 August)
Richard Cyganiak
- Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens? (Thursday, 27 August)
- Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens? (Thursday, 27 August)
Sam Ruby
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
Shane McCarron
- Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens? (Thursday, 27 August)
- Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens? (Thursday, 27 August)
- XHTML+RDFa 1.1 and @lang (Wednesday, 19 August)
- Regrets for Thursday, 20 August (Wednesday, 19 August)
- Re: more microdata feedback (and corrections) (Thursday, 13 August)
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon (Wednesday, 5 August)
Shelley Powers
- Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) (Saturday, 1 August)
Steven Pemberton
- Re: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 August 2009, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 27 August)
- ODF Not Implicated In i4i Suit "thanks to RDFa" (Monday, 17 August)
Toby A Inkster
- HTML5 already includes RDFa (Monday, 17 August)
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
Toby Inkster
- Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens? (Thursday, 27 August)
- Re: Undeclared prefix in @datatype -- what happens? (Thursday, 27 August)
- Re: RDFa usage for SKOS applications (Monday, 24 August)
- http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#itsRules (Friday, 21 August)
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Re: The "real" reason why xmlns should "not" be used (Wednesday, 12 August)
- Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design (Friday, 7 August)