W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:37:13 +0000 (UTC)
To: Martin McEvoy <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
Cc: RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0908112334300.28566@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Martin McEvoy wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> >
> > You might not care about these authors, but I do.
> 
> that's unkind and also not true.

Ah, then I misunderstood your previous e-mail. What did you mean by 'if an 
author doesnt understand this when he is "copy and pasting" then really 
its his look out not mine'?


> you do not think org.example.animal.cat is a long string fair enough, I 
> personally dislike it its unintuitive and frankly ugly, and truthfully 
> it surprises me that you take them so seriously

I certainly would prefer a shorter fully-qualified string. URIs are 
longer. What else is there?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 23:37:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 August 2009 23:37:51 GMT