W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 09:30:53 +0200
Message-ID: <4A73EF2D.1000405@gmx.de>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> That being said, MANY people deal just fine with prefix-based 
>> indirection, and at least one indirection mechanisms we already have in 
>> HTML (class names -> CSS) is *far* more complicated.
> 
> Class names and CSS are also a source of great author confusion.

So I guess we should something better for styling as well?

Yes, indirection mechanisms sometimes create confusion; but on the other 
hand there are reasons to keep them. Painting things in black and white 
when discussing them isn't helpful.

BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 1 August 2009 07:31:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 1 August 2009 07:31:38 GMT