Friday, 1 February 2002
Thursday, 31 January 2002
- RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces in XML and schemas
- RE: anyType
- Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces in XML and schemas
- Re: union of a union legal?
- RE: union of a union legal?
- union of a union legal?
- Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces in XML and schemas
- Re: attributes on complexType from other namespace
Wednesday, 30 January 2002
- Re: Schema Validation
- Re: attributes on complexType from other namespace
- xsv
- Namespaces in XML and schemas
- Re: attributes on complexType from other namespace
- RE: Unexpected Child Element
- Binding to a system time and date
- Unexpected Child Element
- Re: setting dtd to validate against
- Re: attributes on complexType from other namespace
- [ANNOUNCEMENT]: Xerces-J 2.0.0 final release now available
Tuesday, 29 January 2002
- attributes on complexType from other namespace
- Path in schema include element
- setting dtd to validate against
- loading a dtd from a file
Sunday, 27 January 2002
Tuesday, 29 January 2002
- xsd:anyType
- Re: PUBLIC id in notations
- RE: PUBLIC id in notations - oops
- RE: PUBLIC id in notations
- PUBLIC id in notations
- Confirmation needed: block attribute
Saturday, 26 January 2002
Friday, 25 January 2002
Saturday, 26 January 2002
Friday, 25 January 2002
- RE: complexType's typedef
- RE: complexType's typedef
- Re: complexType's typedef
- Hi
- converting variable to numeric
Thursday, 24 January 2002
Friday, 25 January 2002
- Re: list of union-types - simple problem?
- list of union-types - simple problem?
- Re: Is this a valid <restriction > of a complex type
- AW: Schema Location/namespace question.
- RE: Schema Location/namespace question.
- Sample Schema validation
- RE: Substitution group with members having simpleContent or compl exCo ntent
- Is this a valid <restriction > of a complex type
Thursday, 24 January 2002
- Re: looking for help...
- Substitution group with members having simpleContent or complexCo ntent
- Re: XHTML Basic XML Schema
- potential erratum: totalDigits/fractionDigits
- RE: top-level attribute declaration
Wednesday, 23 January 2002
Thursday, 24 January 2002
- XHTML Basic XML Schema
- top-level attribute declaration
- RE: Substitution Groups
- Re: Substitution Groups
- Re: Substitution Groups
- Re: Substitution Groups
- Re: How to Provide default elements in XMLSchema differentiated with attribute values
- Re: choice for attributes?
- Substitution Groups
- RE: validators
- Re: Can local element be abstract?
Wednesday, 23 January 2002
Tuesday, 22 January 2002
- SchemaLocation Question
- Namespace qualification
- Re: problems validating xml with msxml parser
- Re: choice for attributes?
- Re: Schema Question (abstract/enforce)
Wednesday, 23 January 2002
- validators
- RE: XML Schema meta-model, UML
- RE: XML Schema meta-model, UML
- How to Provide default elements in XMLSchema differentiated with attribute values
Tuesday, 22 January 2002
- Re: XML Schema validate?
- Re: XML Schema meta-model, UML
- XML Schema meta-model, UML
- RE: How can i parse schema itself with xerces
- Re: Schema Question (abstract/enforce)
- Re: Mandatory attributes on root element
- Re: contstraint on attribute combination?
- Re: Schema Question (abstract/enforce)
Monday, 21 January 2002
- Schema Question (abstract/enforce)
- Re: How can i parse schema itself with xerces
- problems validating xml with msxml parser
- Mandatory attributes on root element
Sunday, 20 January 2002
Monday, 21 January 2002
Friday, 18 January 2002
- How can i parse schema itself with xerces
- minOccurs help?
- XML Schema validate?
- Re: looking for help...
- attribute derivation
- Re: Can local element be abstract?
- Entity declarations in XML
- Can local element be abstract?
Thursday, 17 January 2002
- RE: Facets on QName, clarification required
- key/keyref and xs:ID/xs:IDREF
- Re: Facets on QName, clarification required
- Facets on QName, clarification required
- RE: XML Schema : Validating contents of one tag with another
- Re: XML Schema : Validating contents of one tag with another
- [Fwd: Clarification needed: anySimpleType]
- Re: pattern facet on list datatypes
- Re: pattern facet on list datatypes
- pattern facet on list datatypes
- RE: XML Schema : Validating contents of one tag with another
- Re: Import/Include question
- Re: XML Schema : Validating contents of one tag with another
- Re: Import/Include question
- Re: Import/Include question
- XML Schema : Validating contents of one tag with another
- Re: Import/Include question
- Re: Import/Include question
- Re: Import/Include question
- Re: Import/Include question
- W3C XML Schema Test Collection - error in expected result of attP 009.xml?
- Re: Import/Include question
- Re: looking for help...
- Re: XML Schema and Xerces2.0.0_beta4
Wednesday, 16 January 2002
- Re: Extension of the lexical space
- looking for help...
- New release of W3C XML Schema Test Collection available
- XML Schema and Xerces2.0.0_beta4
- Import/Include question
- Re: Unnamed type in <schema>
- Unnamed type in <schema>
- RE: Whitespace and patterns
- Re: Whitespace and patterns
- Re: Extension of the lexical space
- Extension of the lexical space
- Re: How do i validate XML Schema , itself?
Tuesday, 15 January 2002
Wednesday, 16 January 2002
Tuesday, 15 January 2002
Monday, 14 January 2002
Tuesday, 15 January 2002
- Re: How to describe it with XML Schema ?
- How to describe it with XML Schema ?
- base64 element performance issue
Monday, 14 January 2002
Tuesday, 15 January 2002
- Re: XML document embedded in the appinfo element?
- Re: some problems regarding to transforming UML to XML Schema
Monday, 14 January 2002
Tuesday, 15 January 2002
Monday, 14 January 2002
- Re: some problems regarding to transforming UML to XML Schema
- Re: schemaLocation in instance documents - how many hints?
- some problems regarding to transforming UML to XML Schema
- Re: XML document embedded in the appinfo element?
- RE: XML document embedded in the appinfo element?
- RE: import in import and namespace
- RE: question about Xerces
- question about Xerces
- Re: XSV down?
- RE: XML Schema example
- XSV down?
- Re: [Moderator Action] RE: XML Schema example
- schemaLocation in instance documents - how many hints?
- Re: [Moderator Action] Validator seems to have a memory
Sunday, 13 January 2002
- Re: import in import and namespace
- ["Eric Gossett" <gossett@bethel.edu>] Re: [Moderator Action] Validator seems to have a memory
- Re: import in import and namespace
- Re: Schema for xml:base attribute
Saturday, 12 January 2002
- Re: FW: User issues with Namespaces in Schema -- {form} qualified vs. unqualified, was [RE: Getting acquainted with schema]
- Re: [Moderator Action] Validator seems to have a memory
- Re: PSVI API spec. (or CM API?)
- RE: FW: User issues with Namespaces in Schema -- {form} qualified vs. unqualified, was [RE: Getting acquainted with schema]
- Re: Redefine and extension base
- Re: FW: User issues with Namespaces in Schema -- {form} qualified vs. unqualified, was [RE: Getting acquainted with schema]
- Re: FW: User issues with Namespaces in Schema -- {form} qualified vs. unqualified, was [RE: Getting acquainted with schema]
- Re: FW: User issues with Namespaces in Schema -- {form} qualified vs. unqualified, was [RE: Getting acquainted with schema]
- Re: FW: User issues with Namespaces in Schema -- {form} qualified vs. unqualified, was [RE: Getting acquainted with schema]
- FW: User issues with Namespaces in Schema -- {form} qualified vs. unqualified, was [RE: Getting acquainted with schema]
- RE: PSVI API spec. (or CM API?)
- Re: Redefine and extension base
- Re: Import/Include/Redefine
- Re: XML document embedded in the appinfo element?
Friday, 11 January 2002
Saturday, 12 January 2002
- Re: import in import and namespace
- Re: Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
- PSVI API spec. (or CM API?)
Friday, 11 January 2002
- Redefine and extension base
- Re: Use of xml:lang versus xs:language
- Import/Include/Redefine
- RE: Use of xml:lang versus xs:language
- Use of xml:lang versus xs:language
- import in import and namespace
- Re: Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
- RE: XML Schema example
- XML Schema example
- Re: Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
- Re: Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
- Re: Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
- Re: Substitution groups: Is the "or" in "restriction or extension " ex clusive?
- Re: Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
- Re: Deriving a simpleContent element from an anyType or anySimple Type
- RE: Substitution groups: Is the "or" in "restriction or extension " ex clusive?
- Re: Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
- Re: Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
- RE: Deriving a simpleContent element from an anyType or anySimple Type
- Re: QNames without prefix
- Re: complexType derivation method
- validator malfunction
- Re: Attribute error - a bug or a feature?
- Re: Substitution groups: Is the "or" in "restriction or extension" ex clusive?
- Re: QNames without prefix
- Re: QNames without prefix
Thursday, 10 January 2002
- Re: WhiteSpace
- RE: Attribute error - a bug or a feature?
- WhiteSpace
- Re: complexType derivation method
- Substitution groups: Is the "or" in "restriction or extension" ex clusive?
- Attribute error - a bug or a feature?
- Re: complexType derivation method
- Re: Adding an attribute to a restricted simple type
- Adding an attribute to a restricted simple type
- Re: Multiple <import> into same namespace?
- Re: complexType derivation method
- RE: complexType derivation method
- Re: Deriving a simpleContent element from an anyType or anySimple Type
- Re: Multiple <import> into same namespace?
- Re: complexType derivation method
- Re: Problems with xs:complexType restriction involving xs:choice
- RE: Deriving a simpleContent element from an anyType or anySimple Type
- Multiple <import> into same namespace?
Wednesday, 9 January 2002
- Re: complexType derivation method
- Re: Problems with xs:complexType restriction involving xs:choice
- RE: Problems with xs:complexType restriction involving xs:choice
- Problems with xs:complexType restriction involving xs:choice
- Re: XML content type ?
- XML content type ?
- New XML Schema Validation Engine
- Re: Schema for xml:base attribute
- RE: group or abstract type?
- Schema for xml:base attribute
- Re: group or abstract type?
- Re: Deriving a simpleContent element from an anyType or anySimpleType
- Re: Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
Tuesday, 8 January 2002
Wednesday, 9 January 2002
Tuesday, 8 January 2002
- Re: Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
- Re: group or abstract type?
- RE: Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
- Re: Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
- Re: Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
- RE: Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
- group or abstract type?
- Re: Substitution groups and Parsing Efficiency
- Help wanted with XML Schema for Dublin Core in RDF/XML
- Re: Problem in writing schema
- RE: simpleType redefinition - must it be a restriction?
- RE: simpleType redefinition - must it be a restriction?
- RE: Substitution groups and Parsing Efficiency
- Problem in writing schema
- Re: Substitution groups and Parsing Efficiency
- Re: simpleType redefinition - must it be a restriction?
Monday, 7 January 2002
- Substitution groups and Parsing Efficiency
- RE: simpleType redefinition - must it be a restriction?
- RE: Sequence fixed attributes
- RE: [SQC is right] Derivation by Restriction and Namespaces [corr ection]
- Re: Validating Schemas With Xerces
- RE: Validating Schemas With Xerces
- Re: Validating Schemas With Xerces
- RE: Validating Schemas With Xerces
- Validating Schemas With Xerces
- datatype information
Sunday, 6 January 2002
Thursday, 3 January 2002
Friday, 4 January 2002
Thursday, 3 January 2002
Friday, 4 January 2002
Saturday, 5 January 2002
- RE: [SQC is right] Derivation by Restriction and Namespaces - SQC Bug?
- Re: simpleType redefinition - must it be a restriction?
- RE: Derivation by Restriction and Namespaces - SQC Bug?
Friday, 4 January 2002
- Re[2]: Correct rules for ComplexType extension
- Re: {disallowed substitutions} with a simple type definition?
- Re: Correct rules for ComplexType extension
- simpleType redefinition - must it be a restriction?
- {disallowed substitutions} with a simple type definition?
- Re: Question about Final Attributes on Elements
- Correct rules for ComplexType extension
Thursday, 3 January 2002
- Re: How can a schema be validated against specification
- Question about Final Attributes on Elements
- Re: [SQC is right] Derivation by Restriction and Namespaces - SQC Bug?
- RE: How can a schema be validated against specification
- How can a schema be validated against specification
- Re: Derivation by Restriction and Namespaces - SQC Bug?
- RE: Derivation by Restriction and Namespaces - SQC Bug?
Wednesday, 2 January 2002
- RE: Semantics of elementFormDefault / Form
- RE: Semantics of elementFormDefault / Form
- RE: forbidding specific strings as content
- Re: Semantics of elementFormDefault / Form
- RE: Semantics of elementFormDefault / Form
- (please excuse previous post) Can a schema be validated against a nother schema
- Derivation by Restriction and Namespaces - SQC Bug?
- Can a schema be validated against another schema