- From: Paul Kiel <paul@xmlhelpline.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:38:08 -0500
- To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <178901c1aa6d$489eac00$2cfca218@pkiel2>
In running some schemas through my various array of tools, I came across an issue that needs clarification. If I defined two simpleTypes that are unions, can I use one as a memberType of the other? I know a union cannot be in a list, but can a union be in a union? Here is an example: <xsd:simpleType name="OneType"> <xsd:union memberTypes="Type1 Type2 Type3"/> </xsd:simpleType> <xsd:simpleType name="OtherType"> <xsd:union memberTypes="OneType Type4 Type5"/> </xsd:simpleType> My first inclination was yes, based on this sentence from the schema spec: 4.1.2.3 Derivation by union "A ·union· datatype can be ·derived· from one or more ·atomic·, ·list· or other ·union· datatypes, known as the ·memberTypes· of that ·union· datatype." I am however getting an error using Topologi (which uses msxml4 under the hood if memory serves) and get the error: "Union datatypes must be derived from an atomic or list datatype." This error made me think that I had read something along those lines before in the spec, but alas I cannot find it. Many thanks for your comments, Paul Kiel W. Paul Kiel Chief Architect HR-XML Consortium 919-846-0224 paul@hr-xml.org
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2002 10:37:00 UTC