- From: Kevin Burges <xmldude@burieddreams.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:32:50 +0000
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
I have a Schema which validates in XSV and XMLSpy, but thich fails to load into an MSXML SchemaCache object, giving an error of: "file:///C:/Development/Test/Test.xsd#/schema[1]/complexType[position() = 2 and @name = 'OutlineEntry']/all[1] <all> is not the only particle in a <group> or being used as an extension." I have had a good look at things and the only thing I can come up with is to ask if having an <xs:all> group in a base type and extending it with a second <xs:all> group in a derived type is perhaps illegal? (if so, XSV & XMLSpy should fail) I've tried reading the specs for this, but it's not ecactly easy going and I haven't cone up with an answer. Here are simplified definitions of the types: <xs:complexType name="OutlineEntry" abstract="true"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation>Base Type definition for an Outilne Entry</xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:all> <xs:element name="Label"> <xs:simpleType> <xs:restriction base="xs:string"> <xs:minLength value="1"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> </xs:element> </xs:all> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="DerivedOutlineEntry"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation>Derived Type definition</xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="OutlineEntry"> <xs:all> <xs:element name="Link"> <xs:simpleType> <xs:restriction base="xs:string"> <xs:minLength value="1"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> </xs:element> </xs:all> </xs:extension> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> -- May the flares be with you, Kevin mailto:xmldude@burieddreams.com ++++++++++++ Cool music - http://burieddreams.com/marshan ++++++ Attitude Webzine - http://burieddreams.com/attitude
Received on Friday, 4 January 2002 06:39:46 UTC