- From: Eddie Robertsson <eddie@allette.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:20:37 +1100
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- CC: boriero <aboriero@hoc.elet.polimi.it>, XSD <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> > As I read the spec this [type named '3'] should also be valid > > although none of the validators I tested with could validate this > > type correctly. > > I demur -- XSV is happy with the attached, which is 1, 2 and 3 with > minor typos and the 'mixed' bug fixed. My mistake. I actually had a typo in the schema I tested with so infact all the validators I tested with can validate this (XSV, XML Spy 4.2 and MSXML4 RTM). Sorry for the confusion. Cheers, /Eddie
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2002 17:11:48 UTC