- From: Kevin Burges <xmldude@burieddreams.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 20:59:18 +0000
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- CC: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
>>> "having an <xs:all> group in a base type and extending >>> it with a second <xs:all> group in a derived type is perhaps >>> illegal? nuic> Yup, illegal. The general rule is that extension is defined as creating a nuic> sequence, and you can't have sequences of <all>. Extension of <all> is a Oh crap. Thanks for the confirmation. Time so send off yet another bug report to Altova... -- groovy baby, Kevin mailto:xmldude@burieddreams.com ++++++++++++ Cool music - http://burieddreams.com/marshan ++++++ Attitude Webzine - http://burieddreams.com/attitude
Received on Friday, 4 January 2002 16:05:50 UTC