>>>Henry S. Thompson said:
> Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> writes:
> > Making these changes XSV 1.203.2.38/1.106.2.21 of 2001/12/07 20:43:15
> > is happy.
>
> Good.
>
> > So my feeling is to publish now, we'll have to drop this xml schema
> > and keep the DTD.
>
> Why, if as you say immediately above your schema is now OK (or at
> least acceptable to XSV)?
Because although it validated correctly, I didn't change the use of
<element fname="rdf:RDF">
and I didn't make two schemas for each namespace dc: and rdf:
both of which I've been told was invalid (by Priscilla).
I attach the schema I've updated.
Dave