- From: Morris Matsa <mmatsa@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:35:15 -0500
- To: "Gregory Khanlarov" <gregory@creativescience.com>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> The first XML snippet is definitely valid. How about the second one ?
> The definition of the 'hexBinary' type states that the whitespace
> value is collapse. Does it mean that the second XML snippet is invalid
> (since it has CR characters) or the
> XML validator must perform value normalization ('collapse') of the
> 'data' element before validation
The latter. They are both valid. The whitespace-facet processing of
'collapse' is handled before the rest of validation.
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2002 18:34:55 UTC