www-validator@w3.org from February 2002 by date

Wednesday, 27 February 2002

• Re: Head section 'not open' Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Head section 'not open' Karl Ove Hufthammer
• Head section 'not open' Paul Wicks

Tuesday, 26 February 2002

• Re: Validator logo for module-based XHTML? Peter Sheerin
• Re: Validator logo for module-based XHTML? Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Used modularization to restore the use of TARGET= Terje Bless
• Re: Validator logo for module-based XHTML? Terje Bless
• Re: Used modularization to restore the use of TARGET= Peter Sheerin
• Re: checklink: no results... Nick Kew
• Re: checklink: Nick Kew
• Re: Validator logo for module-based XHTML? Lloyd Wood
• Re: Validator logo for module-based XHTML? Peter Sheerin
• Re: Validator logo for module-based XHTML? Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Validation Question Karl Ove Hufthammer
• Re: Validator logo for module-based XHTML? Terje Bless
• Re: Validation Question Terje Bless
• Validator logo for module-based XHTML? Peter Sheerin

Monday, 25 February 2002

• checklink: no results... Tuija Eerola
• Re: Used modularization to restore the use of TARGET= Peter Sheerin
• Re: Validation Question Henri Sivonen
• Re: Support for XHTML+SMIL? Nick Kew
• Re: Support for XHTML+SMIL? Bjoern Hoehrmann

Saturday, 23 February 2002

• Validation Question Michael Phillips

Thursday, 21 February 2002

• checklink: Tony Silvestri

Monday, 25 February 2002

• Re: Used modularization to restore the use of TARGET= Terje Bless
• Used modularization to restore the use of TARGET= Peter Sheerin

Sunday, 24 February 2002

• Re: Fwd: W3C logo Lloyd Wood
• Re: opening a link in a new window (hope this is ok for this list) Sascha Claus

Saturday, 23 February 2002

• Fwd: W3C logo Martin Duerst

Friday, 22 February 2002

• Re: opening a link in a new window: is it really so bad? Peter Sheerin
• Re: opening a link in a new window (hope this is ok for this list) Jim Ley
• Re: opening a link in a new window: is it really so bad? Allan Clark
• Re: opening a link in a new window (hope this is ok for this list) todd fahrner
• Re: "+" chars in links as bad as ampersands? Liam Quinn
• Re: Validator bug for HTML 4.01 Strict DTD? Bob Rosenberg
• RE: Problem with ATTLIST Patterson, Elizabeth
• Re: 500 Error Nick Kew

Thursday, 21 February 2002

• Re: Validator bug for HTML 4.01 Strict DTD? Lloyd Wood
• Re: Validator bug for HTML 4.01 Strict DTD? Jim Ley
• Re: Validator bug for HTML 4.01 Strict DTD? todd fahrner
• Re: Validator bug for HTML 4.01 Strict DTD? Jim Ley
• Re: Problem with ATTLIST Nick Kew
• Re: 500 Error Nick Kew
• Re: [www-validator] <none> Nick Kew
• Re: Validator bug for HTML 4.01 Strict DTD? Nick Kew
• Re: Validator bug for HTML 4.01 Strict DTD? Steven Pemberton
• Re: URI? Masayasu Ishikawa

Monday, 18 February 2002

• "+" chars in links as bad as ampersands? Greg Roelofs

Sunday, 17 February 2002

• URI? Michael Hutchison

Thursday, 21 February 2002

• Re: no endtag - still no errors found Liam Quinn
• Re: no endtag - still no errors found Jim Correia

Tuesday, 19 February 2002

• checklink: Michael D Montoya

Saturday, 16 February 2002

• no endtag - still no errors found hn/berlin

Thursday, 21 February 2002

• Re: Validating Nested lists in 4.01 Transitional Liam Quinn

Friday, 15 February 2002

• Problem with ATTLIST Patterson, Elizabeth

Thursday, 21 February 2002

• Re: Check missing in validation. Liam Quinn

Thursday, 14 February 2002

• Validating Nested lists in 4.01 Transitional Donald Firesmith
• [www-validator] <none> David A. Bauer

Friday, 8 February 2002

• 500 Error Barry Coward

Monday, 11 February 2002

• Validator bug for HTML 4.01 Strict DTD? Davydd Cook

Saturday, 9 February 2002

• Check missing in validation. Joe.Waller@orst.edu

Thursday, 21 February 2002

• Re: Support for XHTML+SMIL? Nick Kew

Wednesday, 20 February 2002

• Support for XHTML+SMIL? Peter Sheerin

Tuesday, 19 February 2002

• Re: opening a link in a new window (hope this is ok for this list) Jim Ley
• Re: opening a link in a new window (hope this is ok for this list) todd fahrner
• Re: opening a link in a new window (hope this is ok for this list) Liam Quinn
• opening a link in a new window (hope this is ok for this list) Ian Christie

Monday, 18 February 2002

• Re: Charsets Masayasu Ishikawa

Sunday, 17 February 2002

• Re: [Patch] To get a column number relative to the beginning of the line After
• Re: [Patch] To get a column number relative to the beginning of the line After

Saturday, 16 February 2002

• Re: HTML validator and WebServices Terje Bless
• Re: Patch for real column number of errors Terje Bless
• Re: HTML validator and WebServices Nick Kew
• HTML validator and WebServices Karl Dubost

Friday, 15 February 2002

• Re: Newbie just getting his feet wet... Paul Stanley
• Charsets Tavares, Marcio

Thursday, 14 February 2002

• Re: Newbie just getting his feet wet... Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Newbie just getting his feet wet... Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Newbie just getting his feet wet... Paul Stanley
• Re: Newbie just getting his feet wet... Allan Clark
• Newbie just getting his feet wet... Paul Stanley
• Re: target attribute legal in HTML 4.01 Strict? Liam Quinn
• target attribute legal in HTML 4.01 Strict? Davydd Cook

Wednesday, 13 February 2002

• AW: Validation icon HTML 4.01 Jan Eric Hellbusch
• Re: Validation icon HTML 4.01 Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: validator not doing application/xhtml+xml Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Looks like a bug, does not validate a simple HTML! Serguei Trouchelle
• Re: Looks like a bug, does not validate a simple HTML! Scott Lawrence
• Re: Looks like a bug, does not validate a simple HTML! Serguei Trouchelle
• Looks like a bug, does not validate a simple HTML! Anton Tagunov
• Re: validator not doing application/xhtml+xml Terje Bless

Tuesday, 12 February 2002

• Re: validator not doing application/xhtml+xml Masayasu Ishikawa
• Validation icon HTML 4.01 Jan Eric Hellbusch
• Re: html editors Lloyd Wood
• Re: html editors Philip TAYLOR
• Re: validator not doing application/xhtml+xml Terje Bless
• Re: validator not doing application/xhtml+xml Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: html editors ewitness - Ben Fowler

Saturday, 9 February 2002

• Re: How to automate using HTML validation service Terje Bless
• Re: validator not doing application/xhtml+xml Terje Bless

Monday, 11 February 2002

• Re: &amp; handling problem Scott Lawrence
• Re: &amp; handling problem Liam Quinn
• &amp; handling problem Scott Lawrence
• Re: How to automate using HTML validation service Nick Kew

Saturday, 9 February 2002

• Patch for real column number of errors marc bevand
• Re: Validates incorrect HTML Liam Quinn

Friday, 8 February 2002

• Re: bug in www validator Nick Kew
• Re: bug in www validator Andrew McFarland
• Re: bug in www validator Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: bug in www validator Andrew McFarland
• Re: Validates incorrect HTML Andrew McFarland

Thursday, 7 February 2002

• bug in www validator Klaus Hartnegg
• How to automate using HTML validation service Charles Manske
• Validates incorrect HTML Tony Brindle

Friday, 8 February 2002

• Implied document type name Satoshi ISHIKAWA

Thursday, 7 February 2002

• Re: html editors Lloyd Wood
• Re: html editors Nick Kew
• Re: validator not doing application/xhtml+xml Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: About PE "Color.datatype" in XHTML 1.1 DTD Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Table HEIGHT attribute? Serguei Trouchelle
• Re: What happened to /check/referer ? ewitness - Ben Fowler
• Re: html editors Lloyd Wood
• Re: html editors Philip TAYLOR
• Re: html, head and body tags optional -- but singly, or together? ewitness - Ben Fowler
• Re: html editors ewitness - Ben Fowler
• Re: html editors Andrew McFarland
• Re: Euro Symbol in XHTML Liam Quinn
• Euro Symbol in XHTML Peter Schwab

Wednesday, 6 February 2002

• Re: html, head and body tags optional -- but singly, or together? Nick Kew
• Re: special characters .. bug ?? Nick Kew
• Re: Validator gets wrong input Nick Kew
• Re: Bug: Validates bad HTML Nick Kew
• Re: html editors Lloyd Wood
• Re: html editors Nick Kew

Tuesday, 5 February 2002

• html, head and body tags optional -- but singly, or together? Perry, Russell
• special characters .. bug ?? Nico

Wednesday, 6 February 2002

• Validator gets wrong input Marcus Fuchs
• About PE "Color.datatype" in XHTML 1.1 DTD Satoshi ISHIKAWA

Tuesday, 5 February 2002

• Bug: Validates bad HTML VanDellon, Mark

Sunday, 3 February 2002

• Re: Table HEIGHT attribute? Michael D. Jensen

Friday, 1 February 2002

• html editors Damon Vaudrey

Wednesday, 6 February 2002

• Re: "Sorry, I am unable to validate this document because on line 120 it contained some byte(s)that I cannot interpret as big5"; and _other_ frustrations from an Asian user. Martin Duerst

Monday, 4 February 2002

• Re: EARL in Page Valet Nick Kew
• Re: EARL in Page Valet Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: EARL in Page Valet Nick Kew
• Re: Softquad DTD? ewitness - Ben Fowler

Friday, 1 February 2002

• Re: "valid [X]HTML x.x!" icons are Evil James Ralston
• Re: Minor modification to improve ease of use. Allan Clark
• Re: Minor modification to improve ease of use. Nick Kew
• Re: Suggestion: XML-RPC functionality Nick Kew
• Re: Minor modification to improve ease of use. Nick Kew
• Re: The validator doesn't allow multiple namespace declarations... Masayasu Ishikawa

Last message date: Wednesday, 27 February 2002 06:50:04 UTC