- From: ewitness - Ben Fowler <bfowler@ewitness.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 09:50:06 +0000
- To: www-validator@w3.org
>At 10:50 pm +0100 31/1/02, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >>* Nick Kew wrote: >>>Just encountered the following FPI: >>> >>><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//SoftQuad Software//DTD HoTMetaL PRO >>>6.0::19990601::extensions to HTML >4.0//EN" "hmpro6.dtd"> >>> >>>The local filename for a DTD is of course useless (surely softquad should >>>know better?), and http://www.softquad.com/ declines to load in Konqueror. >>> >>>Although it claims to be PUBLIC, none of the validators recognises it. >>>Should we have it, or is it pure bogus? A further thought on this. My guess is that many of the people here also read the html-tidy list, and the same sort of problem crops up there, with the twist that tidy also attempts to correct then problem, exempli gratia http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/html-tidy/1999JulSep/0154.html Ben.
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 04:50:14 UTC