> ><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//PetesGuide//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus Target//EN" > > "http://www.PetesGuide.com/DTDs/XHTML11target.dtd"> > > As I was saying to Jim just before you stopped by on #validator, you might > want to use the FPI "+//IDN PetesGuide.com//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus Target//EN" > (cf. ISO-8879:1986, TC2, Annex K.4.6[0]). Terje, are you sure? That document seems to talk about SGML rules, not XML. Therefore, I surmise that your statement would be unambiguously correct if I were making my own HTML DTD. But for XHTML, I found this reference: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/conformance.html#s_conform_naming_rules Which says (among other things): The leading field must be "-" to indicate a privately defined resource. Does that take precedence for XHTML DTDs, or must I still follow the ISO document you referenced?Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2002 13:43:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:26 UTC