- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 21:51:27 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>, <www-validator@w3.org>
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Jim Ley wrote: > > Goal now reached. Jim's going to see if this is any use to him > > a clientside app. > > Okay, done this... > [chop - observations suggesting we have some way to go with this] > For www.google.com, both Mozilla, and IE disagree with site-valet - but > then so do I ! > Looking at "#1/2/1/2" that points to a <BR> yet the fuzzy pointer only > makes sense if it points at the table that comes after the BR. - A bug > in Site-valets creation? It's an issue of error handling. Because google has no FPI, SP (valet) is parsing it without a DTD, and using default SGML rules. So it has no way of knowing that <br> should be empty. This has been bothering me for some time, but it's not clear how best to fix it. Once upon a time we'd have inserted a default FPI, but all the validators have now stopped doing that. Maybe we should revert to that as a fixup? Hmm - I'll crosspost this to www-validator. Any other thoughts? -- Nick Kew Site Valet - the mark of Quality on the Web. <URL:http://valet.webthing.com/>
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 16:51:31 UTC