Re: validator not doing application/xhtml+xml

Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org> wrote:

> Just for the record:
> 
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf-announce/Current/msg15878.html
> 
> says that application/xhtml+xml has been approved as an informal RFC
> by the IESG. So I don't see any big reason to wait to implement that
> in the validator.

Just for the record, now that it has been published as RFC 3236, so
I see no reason to wait to implement that in the validator.

    http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3236.txt

Regards,
-- 
Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org
W3C - World Wide Web Consortium

Received on Thursday, 7 February 2002 14:43:38 UTC