- From: Allan Clark <allanc@caldera.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 00:09:27 -0700
- To: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- CC: Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk>, www-validator@w3.org
Nick; Yes, or No with XX failures? Allan Nick Kew wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Andy Mabbett wrote: > > > One small improvement would be some indication, of "pass" or "fail", on the > > top left corner of the page, so that it would be possible to know how a page > > as fared, even when viewing in a small window, or a PDA screen, without > > having to scroll down. > > Do you mean like the little valid/invalid box on Page Valet reports? > > Actually therein lies a good point. Whilst I wouldn't necessarily > regard a minor extra convenience for PDA users as a high priority > here, it would improve overall accessibility to put a simple > yes/no somewhere near the top of the linearisation of a results page. > > As a user, if you're looking for flexibility in the presentation of > your results, why not use an XML (or EARL) option rather than an > HTML page for your reports? > > -- > Nick Kew > > Site Valet - the mark of Quality on the Web. > <URL:http://valet.webthing.com/>
Received on Friday, 1 February 2002 02:40:01 UTC