Wednesday, 31 August 2011
- Re: naive question: why prefer absolute URIs to # URIs for linked data?
- Re: naive question: why prefer absolute URIs to # URIs for linked data?
- Re: naive question: why prefer absolute URIs to # URIs for linked data?
- Re: Agenda for the TAG teleconference of 1 Sept 2011
- Agenda for the TAG teleconference of 1 Sept 2011
- Agenda for the TAG teleconference of 1 Sept 2011
- Very preliminary agenda and required reading for 13-15 Sept. 2011 TAG F2F now available
Tuesday, 30 August 2011
- Re: ACTION-587 Prepare issue-57 and issue-63 documents for TAG members to discuss at Sept F2F
- Re: naive question: why prefer absolute URIs to # URIs for linked data?
Monday, 29 August 2011
- Re: ACTION-587 Prepare issue-57 and issue-63 documents for TAG members to discuss at Sept F2F
- Re: ACTION-587 Prepare issue-57 and issue-63 documents for TAG members to discuss at Sept F2F
- Re: ACTION-587 Prepare issue-57 and issue-63 documents for TAG members to discuss at Sept F2F
- Re: naive question: why prefer absolute URIs to # URIs for linked data?
- Re: naive question: why prefer absolute URIs to # URIs for linked data?
- Re: naive question: why prefer absolute URIs to # URIs for linked data?
Sunday, 28 August 2011
- ACTION-523: Draft product page for TAG work on Client-Side Storage
- naive question: why prefer absolute URIs to # URIs for linked data?
Saturday, 27 August 2011
- Re: Status of TAG work on Publishing and Linking on the Web
- Re: Status of TAG work on Publishing and Linking on the Web
- Re: Status of TAG work on Publishing and Linking on the Web
- ACTION-586 Client-Side State
- Re: Status of TAG work on Publishing and Linking on the Web
- Status of TAG work on Publishing and Linking on the Web
Wednesday, 24 August 2011
- Re: ACTION-588: Update product goals for TAG work on MIME (includes fragid semantics)
- The TAG Teleconference of 25 August 2011 is cancelled
Tuesday, 23 August 2011
- RE: Matching vs. normalization, CSS matching
- Re: ACTION-521: Taking "Disposition of Names in an XML Namespace" to Recommendation
- ACTION-590: TAG work on Unicode normalization (was: Re: Any update on TAG request?)
- RE: Matching vs. normalization, CSS matching
- RE: ACTION-588: Update product goals for TAG work on MIME (includes fragid semantics)
- RE: Matching vs. normalization, CSS matching
- ACTION-587 Prepare issue-57 and issue-63 documents for TAG members to discuss at Sept F2F
Monday, 22 August 2011
- Re: ACTION-501: Geolocation access control on a per site basis
- Re: ACTION-501: Geolocation access control on a per site basis
- ACTION-588: Update product goals for TAG work on MIME (includes fragid semantics)
Sunday, 21 August 2011
- Re: Dan Kaminsky shows tools that can detect net neutrality violations by ISPs
- Dan Kaminsky shows tools that can detect net neutrality violations by ISPs
- Re: Issue-57
- RE: Issue-57
- RDFa / microdata analysis
Saturday, 20 August 2011
- net neutrality: breaking it is detectable
- RE: Matching vs. normalization
- Re: Matching vs. normalization
- RE: Matching vs. normalization
- Matching vs. normalization
- RE: Any update on TAG request?
Friday, 19 August 2011
- RE: Any update on TAG request?
- Re: Issue-57
- RE: Any update on TAG request?
- RE: Any update on TAG request?
- RE: Any update on TAG request?
- Re: Any update on TAG request?
Thursday, 18 August 2011
- Re: Any update on TAG request?
- RE: Any update on TAG request?
- Any update on TAG request?
- Re: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516: Publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security
- RE: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516: Publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security
Wednesday, 17 August 2011
- The TAG teleconference of 18 Aug 2011 is cancelled
- Re: how does host B know that its visitor is the one that visited host A?
Monday, 15 August 2011
- Re: how does host B know that its visitor is the one that visited host A?
- Re: how does host B know that its visitor is the one that visited host A?
- Re: how does host B know that its visitor is the one that visited host A?
- RE: ACTION-586: Updating client-side state to deal with document identity
Sunday, 14 August 2011
- ACTION-586: Updating client-side state to deal with document identity
- Re: how does host B know that its visitor is the one that visited host A?
- Re: how does host B know that its visitor is the one that visited host A?
- Re: how does host B know that its visitor is the one that visited host A?
- Re: how does host B know that its visitor is the one that visited host A?
- Re: how does host B know that its visitor is the one that visited host A?
- Re: how does host B know that its visitor is the one that visited host A?
Saturday, 13 August 2011
- Re: Minutes for August 11 Telcon
- Re: Minutes for August 11 Telcon
- Re: Minutes for August 11 Telcon
- Minutes for August 11 Telcon
- Re: Shut down the RDFa/Microdata Task Force initiative
- Re: Shut down the RDFa/Microdata Task Force initiative
Friday, 12 August 2011
- Re: Shut down the RDFa/Microdata Task Force initiative
- Re: how does host B know that its visitor is the one that visited host A?
- Shut down the RDFa/Microdata Task Force initiative
- how does host B know that its visitor is the one that visited host A?
- Re: Re http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/510
- Re: Re http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/510
Thursday, 11 August 2011
- Re: ACTION-521: Taking "Disposition of Names in an XML Namespace" to Recommendation
- Fragids status report [partial]: ACTION-567
- Re: ACTION-521: Taking "Disposition of Names in an XML Namespace" to Recommendation
- Re: Agenda for the 11 Aug 2011 TAG teleconference
- Re: ACTION-586: Ashok to update client finding to discuss document identification in Ajax apps
- Agenda for the 11 Aug 2011 TAG teleconference
- ACTION-586: Ashok to update client finding to discuss document identification in Ajax apps
- ACTION-521: Taking "Disposition of Names in an XML Namespace" to Recommendation
- Closing ACTION-582: Noah to inform HTML WG of satisfaction with authoring spec resolution
- ACTION-536: TAG work on interaction
Wednesday, 10 August 2011
- Re: Tracking TAG high-priority goals and deliverables
- Re: Tracking TAG high-priority goals and deliverables
- Re: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516: Publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security
- Re: Requesting status update on TAG fragid work
- Re: Tracking TAG high-priority goals and deliverables
- Re: Requesting status update on TAG fragid work
- Tracking TAG high-priority goals and deliverables
- RE: Advice please on XML: attributes and namespaces
Tuesday, 9 August 2011
- Re: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516: Publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security
- Re: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516: Publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security
- Re: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516: Publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security
- Re: the problem of unregistered MIME types, URI schemes, etc.
Monday, 8 August 2011
- RE: the problem of unregistered MIME types, URI schemes, etc.
- Re: Comments solicited: "Providing and discovering definitions of URIs"
- Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2011-08-04
- Requesting status update on TAG fragid work
- Re: the problem of unregistered MIME types, URI schemes, etc.
- the problem of unregistered MIME types, URI schemes, etc.
Saturday, 6 August 2011
- Re: Test suites and RFC2119: meaning of language conformance
- RE: Test suites and RFC2119: meaning of language conformance
- Re: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516: Publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security
Friday, 5 August 2011
- Re: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516: Publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security
- Re: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516: Publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security
- RE: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516: Publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security
- Re: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516: Publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security
- RE: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516: Publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security
Thursday, 4 August 2011
Wednesday, 3 August 2011
- Re: Comments solicited: "Providing and discovering definitions of URIs"
- UK government backs off one approach to curtailing illegal file sharing
- Re: RDF Web Applications WG Position on RDFa/Microdata Task Force
- Re: RDF Web Applications WG Position on RDFa/Microdata Task Force
- Re: RDF Web Applications WG Position on RDFa/Microdata Task Force
- Re: RDF Web Applications WG Position on RDFa/Microdata Task Force
- Re: RDF Web Applications WG Position on RDFa/Microdata Task Force