- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:07:13 -0400
- To: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
- CC: www-tag@w3.org
Fred Hirsch wrote: > Is there a summary of TAG HTML5 review (e.g. issues and their resolution )? > I didn't see a hyperlink for that one in the table. As I said in my note to Jeff, the HTML5 work we did mostly predates the "product page" form of tracking, and I don't propose to spend the time to speeklunk the record to create a page retroactively. The product pages are mainly for planning from this point forward. That said, various specific TAG initiatives have been pursued under the HTML5 review banner. For example, in 2008 we first raised a concern about the integration of the language specification into what is an some respects a larger user-agent specification as well. Work with the HTML WG, spread over nearly three years, has resulted in a plan that the TAG considers to be a significant improvement. [1,2] I don't have one comprehensive list of all HTML5-related review work that that TAG ever did, but the HTML section from our July 2010 status report [3] is representative. The recent proposal by the TAG for increased focus on the Microdata/RDFa overlap issue results in part from our work on HTML5. We did within the past few weeks, noting the 3 August 2011 last call deadline, survey to see whether TAG members had new Last Call issues to raise, and the answer was that we did not as of then. Thank you. Noah [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/379 [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/556 [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/sum07.html#html On 8/10/2011 2:13 PM, Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com wrote: > Hi Noah > > This is useful, thanks. > > > Were there any non-editorial concerns? > > Thanks > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > > > On Aug 10, 2011, at 1:25 PM, ext Noah Mendelsohn wrote: > >> Jeff, >> >> When you met with us in June, we agreed to provide you with information on at least two major TAG projects that you could track as deliverables for 2011 and beyond. >> >> In fact, we are attempting to be both more organized and more public about identifying the goals, success criteria, deliverables, target dates, etc. for our key projects. We have set up a publicly visible work plan page, which I think has what we promised you and somewhat more. It's available at [1], and it will be updated as our plans change. >> >> Note that for each project, a link is provided to a page that includes high-level goals, specific success criteria, dates for key deliverables or at least for next steps, names of TAG members taking the lead, etc. (The exception is the HTML5 Last Call Review, which has generated significant results in a number of areas in 2011, but which was largely done by the time the product page structure was put in place). >> >> If you are looking for two specific projects to evaluate for 2011, I would suggest the HTML5 review work, which represented significant effort in 2011 (and before), and which has produced results in a number of areas, and the Web Application State effort, which should result in a TAG finding publication in 2011. Another possibility would be the project on fragment identifiers, but with one caveat: the 31 December 2011 target for a TAG finding was set before Jeni Tennison was asked to focus more on the microdata/RDFa task force work, and I don't yet have commitments from TAG members to backfill on the same schedule. I expect the fragid work will get done, and done well, but perhaps a bit later than we originally thought. We will, of course, update that work plan and product page when and if we revise our schedule. >> >> In any case, I encourage you to track all of our significant projects using to the work plan page at [1], and to point others to it when they have questions about the TAG's ongoing work. >> >> Thank you. >> >> Noah >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/ >> >> Tracker: this email fulfills TAG ACTION-568 >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2011 19:07:50 UTC