- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:03:05 -0400
- To: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
A very preliminary draft of an agenda for our Edinburgh F2F is now
available at [1], and in text-only form below. Note that this version does
not include hour-by-hour time slot schedules, but does have descriptions
for most of the topics I propose that we discuss.
The agenda includes a number of required reading items. A text search for
the string "required reading" should hit them all.
We will discuss this agenda on our Thursday 1 Sept. 2011 teleconference.
Thank you.
Noah
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/09/13-agenda
============================================================
[1]W3C | [2]TAG
[1] http://www.w3.org/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
W3C TAG meeting 13-15 Septembter 2011 in Edinburgh, UK
WORK IN PROGRESS DRAFT
PRELIMINARY - FOR TAG REVIEW
Nearby: [3]issues list - [4]findings - [5]www-tag archive - [6]tag
archive - Actions: ([7]open, [8]pending review) [9]logistics
[3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues
[4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/
[7] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/open
[8] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
[9] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/09/local-arrangements.html
Online table of: [10]scribing assignments
[10] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/09/F2FScribing.html
Agenda Summary
Hour-by-hour schedule to be provided later
Logistics
Venue
School of Informatics
University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, UK
See [29]logistics for further details.
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/09/local-arrangements.html
Note [30]Inaugural Lecture by Henry Thompson, Tuesday 13 September
2011, 5.15pm,
[30]
http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/informatics/news-events/inlecture/henrythompson
Required Reading
See "(required reading)" annotations in agenda items below. For your
convenience, I've listed some of the main required reading here as
well:
* [31]TAG Product Listing and all product pages linked from that
— note especially the proposed revision to the scope of
[32]Product: MIME architecture for the Web and the new proposed
page for [33]Product: Web Application Storage
* [34]Identifying Application State W3C Editors Draft: Proposed
TAG Finding 30 August 2011 — proposed as ready for publication
as a TAG finding
* [35]Mime Types and Fragment IDs: Draft TAG Finding 12 August
2011
* [36]Email from Larry Masinter suggesting change in focus for
work on [37]Product: MIME architecture for the Web; also, links
from the sections itemized as (a. - f.) in the proposed revision
section at the top.
* [38]Interoperability of referential uses of hashless URIs by
Jonathan Rees ([39]announcement email)
* [40]Information Resources and Web Metadata: Editor's Draft 25
June 2011 by Jonathan Rees ([41]announcement email)
* [42]Providing and discovering definitions of URIs: Editor's
Draft 25 June 2011" by Jonathan Rees ([43]announcement email)
* [44]HTML/XML Task Force Report W3C Editor's Draft (with revision
marks) 15 August 2011
[31] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/
[32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/mimeweb.html
[33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/clientsidestorage.html
[34]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/IdentifyingApplicationState-20110830.html
[35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids-2011-08-12
[36] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Aug/0099.html
[37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/mimeweb.html
[38] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/09/referential-use.html
[39] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Aug/0097.html
[40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/ir/20110625/
[41] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011May/0040.html
[42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/issue57/20110625/
[43] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011May/0088.html
[44] http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/snapshot/
Agenda Details
1. Convene, review agenda
+ Scribes: TAG members are encouraged to sign up for scribing
by using CVS to edit [45]scribing assignments table, or by
emailing the chair
+ Roll call
+ Approve minutes of teleconferences:
o [46]1 September 2011
+ F2F Goals:
o Main goals:
1. Make progress on our [47]five top priority
products:
@ HTML5 Last Call Review
@ [48]Fragment Identifiers and Mime Types
@ [49]Web Application State
@ [50]URI Definition Discovery
@ [51]MIME architecture for the Web
2. Prepare client-side state finding for publication
(unless we decide there's too much more to do on
#! and/or RDFa use of fragids
3. Review status of RDFa/Microdata task force, and
set up appropriate ACTIONs for tracking
4. Make progress on our [52]other active products
5. Give guidance and feedback to Norm Walsh and the
subcommittee working on XML/HTML Unification
6. Rebalance TAG member assignments (noting, e.g.,
Jeni's new responsibilities for RDFa/Microdata)
o Other goals:
1. Help Noah prepare for: [53]ACTION-563: on - Noah
Mendelsohn - Arrange for periodic TAG key issues
reports to Jeff per June 2011 F2F Due 2011-10-15
- Due: 2011-09-15 - OPEN
2. Review TAG Priorities for 2011
+ Goals:
o Remind ourselves of priorities and commitments from
[54]TAG product pages
o This Tuesday session is primarily a quick level-set at
the start of the F2F — updates and debates about the
priorities will happen as we go along and in a session
on Thursday.
+ Agree that product "HTML5 Last Call Review" has been
completed. Assign action for long term tracking of future
HTML5 developments.
3. [55]HTML5 Review: HTML5 Last Call — Overview
+ Goals:
o Split this work: 1) Mark as completed the TAG's Last
Call review of HTML5 except for 2) start tracking a
separate specific work-item on [56]Microdata/RDFa (see
agenda item below)
o Assign an ACTION to track ongoing developments
relating to HTML5, so TAG will be alerted when further
review is needed
+ Background:
o The HTML working group issued a [57]press release
inviting comments from the public.
o The last call period ran through 3 August 2011.
Several TAG members reviewed particular sections, but
declined to suggest addtional comments be made on
behalf of the TAG.
o Background notes from June 2011 F2F:
# Note from Noah to HTML WG chairs [58]questioning
non-normative status of the [59]HTML5 Edition for
Web Authors
# On 12 May 2011, [60]Henry Thompson and Dan
Appelquist agreed to review selected items, but
we probably need more coverage from other TAG
members if possible.
# Note that [61]Polyglot Markup: HTML-Compatible
XHTML Documents is part of the Last Call, and is
pertinent to the [62]HTML / XML Unification
agenda item.
# [63]public-iri mailing list discussion of IRI
handling and RFC 3987 in HTML5 ([64]heads up
email from Noah)
4. [65]HTML5 Review: HTML5 Last Call — Microdata/RDFa
+ Goals:
o Decide whether Microdata/RDFa task force remains the
most appropriate approach to helping the community
resolve the overlap between these technologies
o If the TAG will have ongoing involvement, establish
goals, target dates, assignments, etc., and capture in
a product page (there are currently no open ACTIONs on
this)
+ Background:
o TAG [66]e-mail raising last-call issues on Microdata
and RDFa. (required reading)
o [67]Discussion on 21 July 2011
5. [68]ISSUE-60 (webApplicationState-60): Web Applications:
Client-side state
+ Goals:
o Prepare for publication of a TAG finding on
Identifying Application State
o Review the [69]Identifying Application State W3C
Editors Draft: Proposed TAG Finding 30 August 2011
with the intention of announcing publication of a TAG
finding shortly after the F2F.
o Assign new action to publish T.V. Raman's original
draft as a W3C Note with an indication that it is no
longer on the Rec track, and referencing the new
finding (see [70]Key Deliverables for this product
+ Background:
o Product page: [71]Product: Identifying Application
State Commitments:
# TAG Finding: Identifying Application State Due
date: 1 Nov 2011
# 25 June 2011: Draft for TAG review based on June
2011 F2F review
# 1 Sept 2011: Last-call quality draft
# W3C Note with FPWD (Raman's version) indicating
this work no longer on Rec. track (to be done
after reference to finding available)
o [72]ACTION-481: Update client-side state document with
help from Raman
o [73]ACTION-586: on - Ashok Malhotra - Add text
covering advice equivalent to "Use of AJAX
implementation technology is not a sufficient excuse
for failing to provide first class URI identification
for documents on the Web" - Due: 2011-08-11 - OPEN
6. [74]ISSUE-66 (mimeAndWeb-66-27): IETF Draft on MIME and the Web
+ Goal:
o Consider [75]Larry Masinter's suggestion that the
goals of this effort be changed to focus more on
review of ongoing work at the IETF.
o Coordinate this general work on MIME with the
[76]ongoing work on fragment identifiers.
+ Background:
o Product page: [77]MIME architecture for the Web
Commitments:
# 31 December 2011: Final TAG Report on MIME
architecture, most likely in the form of an
Internet Draft
# 30 September 2011: Report finalized
# 30 September 2011: TAG achieves [78]success
criteria , and identifies further goals and next
steps, if any
o Drafts have been published at:
[79]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/mimeweb.html
o See proposal at the top of the [80]product page
suggesting new goals for this effort.
o [81]Blog posting from Larry that kicked off this work.
o [82]ACTION-472: on - Larry Masinter - Update the
mime-draft based on comments & review - Due:
2011-07-30 - OPEN
o [83]ACTION-588: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Work with Larry
to update mime-web product page Due 2011-08-18 - Due:
2011-09-15 - OPEN
o Closed actions:
# [84]ACTION-425: on - Larry Masinter - Draft
updated MIME finding(s), with help from DanA,
based on www-tag discussion - Due: 2010-05-31 -
CLOSED
# [85]ACTION-458: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Schedule
discussion of followup actions for TAG to
coordinate with IETF on MIME-type related
activities - Due: 2011-09-01 - CLOSED
# [86]ACTION-467: on - Larry Masinter - Revise Mime
& Web blog entry, perhaps leading to Internet
Draft - Due: 2010-09-21 - CLOSED
7. [87]ISSUE-60 (webApplicationState-60): Web Applications:
Fragment ID Semantics and MIME Types
+ Goals:
o Review [88]Mime Types and Fragment IDs: Draft TAG
Finding 12 August 2011
o Make decision on direction we take on RDFa Core
([89]ACTION-509)
o Decide whether [90]ACTION-543: on - Jeni Tennison -
Propose addition to MIME/Web draft to discuss sem-web
use of fragids not grounded in media type - Due:
2011-06-28 - OPEN is properly phrased given change in
direction on [91]MIME architecture for the Web
o Make decision (again) on direction we take on 3023bis
(application/xml)
o Make sure Product Page [92]Fragment Identifiers and
Mime Types reflects our intentions for work in this
area moving forward.
+ Background:
o Product page: [93]Fragment Identifiers and Mime Types
Commitments:
# Draft Finding for review by relevant editors by
end of 31 July 2011
# 31 December 2011: TAG Finding
o On [94]4 August 2011, Peter Linss agrees to join Jeni
Tennison and Henry Thompson working on [95]ACTION-567
and [96]ACTION-543
o [97]ACTION-567: on - Jeni Tennison - Draft a document
describing problems around fragids and ways things
should be changed - Due: 2011-06-28 - OPEN
o [98]ACTION-543: on - Jeni Tennison - Propose addition
to MIME/Web draft to discuss sem-web use of fragids
not grounded in media type - Due: 2011-06-28 - OPEN
o See also: background material for [99]6-8 June 2011
F2F discussion of Fragment Identifiers
o Note possible relationship to draft TAG Finding on
Client-Side State
o [100]ACTION-508: on - Larry Masinter - Draft proposed
bug report against HTML5 media type registration
regarding interpretation of fragid in HTML-based AJAX
apps - Due: 2011-07-19 - PENDING REVIEW
o [101]ACTION-509: on - Jonathan Rees - Communicate with
RDFa WG regarding documenting the fragid / media type
issue - Due: 2011-09-15 - OPEN
8. [102]ISSUE-57 (HttpRedirections-57), [103]ISSUE-63
(metadataArchitecture-63) and [104]ISSUE-14 (HttpRange-14) : URI
Definition Discovery; Metadata Architecture
+ Goals:
o Review new drafts from Jonathan
o Validate product page
+ Background:
o Product page: [105]URI Definition Discovery
Commitments:
# Key Deliverables:
@ July 2012: PR(s) or similar document
covering the following:
1. URI definition discovery architecture
2. ontology (RDF vocabulary) as needed
@ July 2012: TAG Note on semantics of metadata
for 'information resources'
# Schedule:
@ 20 June 2011: Revise the two issue-57
drafts, put out for review on semantic-web
and/or LOD lists
@ 20 Jul 2011: Telcon or meeting with
concerned parties
@ 18 Sept: Decision regarding venue (rec track
vs. something else)
@ 25 Sept: FPWD or equivalent (note: TPAC 2011
publication freeze is mid-October)
o [106]Interoperability of referential uses of hashless
URIs by Jonathan Rees ([107]announcement email) —
required reading
o [108]Providing and discovering definitions of URIs:
Editor's Draft 25 June 2011 by Jonathan Rees
([109]announcement email) — required reading
o [110]Information Resources and Web Metadata: Editor's
Draft 25 June 2011 by Jonathan Rees ([111]announcement
email) — required reading
o [112]Wiki page on httpRange-14 history (optional
reading)
o [113]A diagram explaining "metadata", from Jonathan
Rees
o [114]ACTION-201: on - Jonathan Rees - Report on status
of AWWSW discussions - Due: 2011-09-06 - OPEN
o [115]ACTION-282: on - Jonathan Rees - Draft a finding
on metadata architecture. - Due: 2011-09-06 - OPEN
o [116]ACTION-413: on - Dan Connolly - Suggest a path
thru some logic terminology that might speed up
httpSemantics discussions - Due: 2010-05-07 - CLOSED
o [117]ACTION-587: on - Jonathan Rees - Prepare issue-57
and issue-63 documents for TAG members to discuss at
Sept F2F - Due: 2011-08-23 - OPEN
9. [118]ISSUE-60 (webApplicationState-60): Web Applications:
Client-side Storage
+ Goals:
o Decide whether [119]Product Page: Web Application
Storage represents work the TAG wants to undertake
o Discuss [120]Slides from Ashok to be presented at this
F2F Check that these weren't reviewed at previous F2F
o Currently tracking under [121]ISSUE-60, which is the
same one we're using for more transient client-side
state. Is ISSUE-60 appropriate for both?
+ Background:
o Required reading: [122]Slides from Ashok to be
presented at this F2F ([123]announcement email)
o From [124]discussion of storage at Feb 2011 F2F:
NM: Assuming this is a separate document, what are the
top three questions it will answer for the community?
AM: Give me three weeks
NM: OK, let's suspend judgement on the long-term
future of this work until we see your response
o Ashok' slides from Feb 2011 F2F "Client-Side Storage"
([125]ppt, [126]pdf)
o Required reading: [127]Client-side Storage : this
version was prepared for the October 2010 F2F
o [128]ACTION-475: on - Ashok Malhotra - Write finding
on client-side storage, DanA to review - Due:
2011-05-24 - OPEN
o [129]ACTION-482: on - Ashok Malhotra - Write a draft
on client-side storage with help from DanA Due:
2010-11-30 - Due: 2010-10-27 - CLOSED -- it was noted
that this action was redundant with ACTION-475
10. [130]ISSUE-50 (URNsAndRegistries-50): Persistent references
+ Goals:
o Prepare product page for this work
o Discuss now work on this issue by Jonathan Rees (as of
30 August, Jonthan reports that he is hoping to have
something, but is not sure of the prospects — if he
doesn't have anything, then we'll just pick up where
we were in June, and decide whether this should
continue to be a "TAG Product", and if so with what
priorities, etc.)
+ Background:
o [131]ACTION-478: on - Jonathan Rees - Prepare a second
draft of a finding on persistence of references, to be
based on decision tree from Oct. 2010 F2F - Due:
2011-08-09 - OPEN
o [132]ACTION-477: on - Henry Thompson - Organize
meeting on persistence of domains - Due: 2011-08-10 -
OPEN
o See also [133]agenda item on Persistent References
from 6-8 June 2011 F2F (as best the chair can
determine, this was on the agenda for June, but not
discussed due to time constraints)
o [134]Jonathan requests opportunity for F2F discussion
and lists potential discussion topics
o Closed actions and earlier discussion:
# [135]Discussion at Feb. 2011 F2F
# [136]ACTION-444: on - Jonathan Rees - Draft a
white paper on link persistence - Due: 2010-10-11
- CLOSED
# [137]ACTION-414: on - Henry S. Thompson - Prepare
a draft agenda, including goals and means, for a
proposed afternoon session with invited guests,
and circulate for discussion prior to a decision,
on the subject of addressing the persistence of
domain names - Due: 2010-06-01 - CLOSED
# [138]June 2010 F2F discussion of domain name
persistence; [139]October 2010 F2F discussion of
domain name persistence
11. [140]ISSUE-25 (deepLinking-25): Can publication of hyperlinks
constitute copyright infringment?
+ Goals:
o Resolve confusion regarding goals, TAG member
assignments and next steps for this work.
+ Background:
o Product page: [141]Publishing and Linking on the Web
Commitments:
# Key Deliverables:
@ TAG W3C Proposed Recommendation: June 2012
# Schedule:
@ Preliminary legal review between draft
editors, W3C legal staff (Rigo?) others
(Thinh Nguyen)
@ First public working draft 15 October 2011 -
before TPAC 2011 publication freeze
o Draft: [142]Publishing and Linking on the Web Draft
TAG Finding 08 June 2011
o [143]June 2011 F2F discussion concluded next step
would be legal review. Dan Appelquist agreed to look
into it, but [144]progress has been slow.
o TAG chair's [145]query for status of this work and
followup discussion
o [146]ACTION-541: on - Jeni Tennison - Helped by DKA to
produce a first draft of terminology about
(deep-)linking etc. - Due: 2011-07-26 - OPEN
o Earlier background:
# [147]Discussion on 28 April 2011, [148]17 March
2011, [149]31 March 2011, and [150]14 April 2011
of "Copyright and Deep Linking"
# Tim Berners-Lee [151]alerts the TAG to US legal
case in which a Mr. Brian McCarthy has been
accused of copyright infringement resulting from
his (alleged) publication of links to copyrighted
material. (See also long ensuing email thread.)
([152]Criminal complaint)
# [153]Suggestion to write a technical document on
linking and copying (Jonathan)
# [154]Discussion with Thinh Nguyen at 3 Dec 2010
TAG telcon
# [155]ACTION-505: on - Daniel Appelquist - Start a
document wrt issue-25 - Due: 2011-03-01 - CLOSED
12. [156]ISSUE-67 (HTML-XML-Divergence-67): HTML / XML Unification
+ Preparation of a final agenda item on this is being held
pending discussions with Norm as to what feedback he needs
form us - see whether Norm wants to join us by phone
+ Goals:
o Decide whether to recommend publication of
[157]HTML/XML Task Force Report W3C Editor's Draft
(with revision marks) 15 August 2011 as a Note from
the HTML/XML Unification Task Force
o Decide whether further effort is required by the TAG
regarding HTML / XML Unification at this time — if so
set goals, perhaps do product page
+ Background:
o [158]HTML/XML Task Force Report W3C Editor's Draft
(with revision marks) 15 August 2011 — required
reading
o [159]ACTION-437: on - Tim Berners-Lee - Create a task
force on XML / HTML convergence - Due: 2011-06-01 -
CLOSED
o Norm Walsh is chairing a group under the TAG's
auspices ([160]mailing list)
o See also:
# [161]Polyglot Markup: HTML-Compatible XHTML
Documents (part of HTML5 Last Call)
# [162]Note from T.V. Raman (3 May 2010)
# [163]ACTION-433: on - Tim Berners-Lee - Help Tim
get in touch with staff etc. re XML/HTML
unification - Due: 2010-05-28 - CLOSED
# [164]ACTION-427: on - John Kemp - Read 4
distributed extensibility proposals and summarize
them w.r.t. proposals TAG has discussed to date -
Due: 2010-11-01 - CLOSED
# Discussion on 7 June 2010 F2F: [165]"TAG
recommends the formation of a task force to drive
the reunification of XML and HTML"
# [166]September/October 2010 HMTL WG poll on
distributed extensibility
# [167]TAG endorses "like SVG" extension mechanism
for HTML5
13. Administration:
+ Future TAG F2F meetings
o TPAC in Santa Clara, 31 Oct. - 4 Nov. 2011
o [168]RESOLVED (at June 2011 F2F): The TAG will meet in
Cambridge, MA USA 4-6 January 2012
o [169]RESOLVED (at June 2011 F2F): TAG members will
hold 2-4 April 2012 for TAG meeting in Sophia
Antipolis, France. The meeting is not yet confirmed.
It's still in order to ask for changes.
+ Group photo?
14. Action item review:
+ [170]Pending review actions in [171]Tracker
+ [172]Overdue actions in [173]Tracker
+ [174]Open actions in [175]Tracker
[45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/09/F2FScribing.html
[46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/09/01-minutes
[47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/#toppriority
[48] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids.html
[49] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/clientsidestate.html
[50] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/defininguris.html
[51] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/mimeweb.html
[52] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/#active
[53] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/563
[54] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/
[55] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/products/6
[56] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Jun/0136.html
[57] http://www.w3.org/2011/05/html5lc-pr.html.en
[58] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Jun/0000.html
[59] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110525/author/
[60] http://www.w3.org/2011/05/html5lc-pr.html.en
[61] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html-polyglot-20110525/
[63] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2011May/0026.html
[64] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011May/0077.html
[65] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/products/6
[66] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Jun/0136.html
[67] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/07/21-minutes#item03
[68] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/60
[69]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/IdentifyingApplicationState-20110830.html
[70] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/clientsidestate.html
[71] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/clientsidestate.html
[72] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/481
[73] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/586
[74] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/66
[75] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Aug/0099.html
[76] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids.html
[77] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/mimeweb.html
[78] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/mimeweb.html#criteria
[79] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/mimeweb.html
[80] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/mimeweb.html
[81] http://masinter.blogspot.com/2010/06/mime-and-web.html
[82] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/472
[83] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/588
[84] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/425
[85] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/458
[86] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/467
[87] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/60
[88] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids-2011-08-12
[89] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/509
[90] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/543
[91] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/mimeweb.html
[92] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids.html
[93] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids.html
[94] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/08/04-minutes#item04
[95] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/567
[96] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/543
[97] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/567
[98] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/543
[99] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/06-agenda#mimefrag
[100] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/508
[101] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/509
[102] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/57
[103] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/63
[104] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/14
[105] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/defininguris.html
[106] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/09/referential-use.html
[107] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Aug/0097.html
[108] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/issue57/20110625/
[109] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011May/0088.html
[110] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/ir/20110625/
[111] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011May/0040.html
[112] http://www.w3.org/wiki/HttpRange14Webography
[113] http://odontomachus.wordpress.com/2011/02/21/the-place-of-metadata/
[114] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/201
[115] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/282
[116] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/413
[117] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/587
[118] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/60
[119] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/09/13-agenda.html
[120] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/05/ClientSideStorageRev2.pdf
[121] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/60
[122] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/05/ClientSideStorageRev2.pdf
[123] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2011May/0038.html
[124] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/02/10-minutes#item03
[125] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/02/ClientSideStorage.ppt
[126] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/02/ClientSideStorage.pdf
[127] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/09/ClientSideStorage.html
[128] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/475
[129] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/482
[130] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/50
[131] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/478
[132] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/477
[133] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/06-agenda#persistence
[134] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Jun/0009.html
[135] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/02/09-minutes#item06
[136] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/444
[137] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/414
[138] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/06/07-minutes.html#item04
[139] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/10/20-minutes#item01
[140] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/25
[141] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/PublishingLinking.html
[142] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/publishingAndLinkingOnTheWeb
[143] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/08-minutes.html#item01
[144] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Aug/0111.html
[145] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Aug/0106.html
[146] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/541
[147] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/04/28-minutes#item07
[148] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/03/17-minutes#item04
[149] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/03/31-minutes#item03
[150]
file://localhost/C:/Noah/Web/TAG/CVS/WWW/2001/tag/2011/04/14-minutes.html#item05
[151] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Mar/0044.html
[152] http://act.demandprogress.org/sign/dhscomplaint/
[153] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Mar/0102.html
[154] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/12/02-minutes.html#item01
[155] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/505
[156] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/67
[157] http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/snapshot/report.html
[158] http://www.w3.org/2010/html-xml/snapshot/
[159] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/437
[160] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-xml/
[161] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html-polyglot-20110525/
[162]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-forum/2010AprJun/0073.html
[163] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/433
[164] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/427
[165] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/09/13-agenda.html
[166] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-41-objection-poll/results
[167] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Oct/0034.html
[168] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/08-minutes.html#item05
[169] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/08-minutes.html#item05
[170] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
[171] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
[172] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue
[173] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
[174] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/open
[175] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
Optional Agenda Items
As of 30 August, agenda planning for the following is incomplete.
Time is likely tight, so I'm putting these in an optional section,
in part to see which ones get the most support. Also note that in
some cases, details for these are not completely correct. I will, of
course, fix the ones that stay on the final agenda. [Noah]
1. [176]Web Applications: Design of APIs for Web Applications
(minimization)
+ Goals:
o Review [177]Data Minimization in Web APIs: Draft TAG
Finding 05 June 2011 a new draft from Dan on API
minmization, promised for 3 June 2011 (not required
reading, due to late arrival)
o Decide whether the TAG wants to produce a Finding on
Design of APIs for Web Applications
+ Background:
o [178]Data Minimization in Web APIs: Draft TAG Finding
05 June 2011
o Brief [179]discussion on 12 May 2011
o [180]Discussion at Feb 2011 TAG F2F
o [181]ACTION-514: on - Daniel Appelquist - Draft
finding on API minimization Due: 2011-02-01 - Due:
2011-01-27 - OPEN
o From previous F2F: [182]Dan Appelquist writeup on API
Design - ([183]announcement email)
o [184]ACTION-461: on - Daniel Appelquist - Draft
"finding" on Web Apps API design - Due: 2010-12-31 -
CLOSED
2. Product: [185]Coordination with IAB/IETF on architecture of web
applications: Joint session with Internet Architecture Board
+ Goal:
o Discuss technical topics of mutual interest with the
Internet Architecture Board
+ Background:
o [186]ACTION-566: on - Daniel Appelquist - Contact
Alissa Cooper, organize a future joint discussion on
privacy with IAB. - Due: 2011-07-19 - OPEN
o Please see [187]draft agenda for IAB/TAG discussions
o TAG panel participation at IETF meeting in Prague
([188]slides, [189]TAG post facto discussion)
o [190]ACTION-549: on - Larry Masinter - (with help from
Henry and Yves) make proposals for topics to be
pursued with IAB - Due: 2011-06-02 - OPEN
o [191]ACTION-460: on - Daniel Appelquist - Coordinate
with IAB regarding next steps on privacy policy - Due:
2011-05-24 - OPEN
o [192]ACTION-497: on - Larry Masinter - Prepare us for
a teleconference with IETF-IAB on possible prague IETF
presentation. - Due: 2010-12-21 - CLOSED
3. [193]ACTION-545: Privacy
+ On [194]11 August 2011 we agreed to have "at most" 1/2 hour
on this, and much skepticism was expressed
+ Goals:
o Review the [195]Report of the W3C Workshop on Web
Tracking and User Privacy (required reading)
o We will focus primarily, but not exclusively on "Do
Not Track" proposals
o Decide how the TAG will engage in privacy-related work
for the remainder of 2011
+ Background:
o [196]Report of the W3C Workshop on Web Tracking and
User Privacy (required reading)
o [197]ACTION-460: on - Daniel Appelquist - Coordinate
with IAB regarding next steps on privacy policy - Due:
2011-05-24 - OPEN
o [198]ACTION-550: on - Daniel Appelquist - With help
from Noah to plan TAG work on privacy, leading to
session at F2F, next step is contact with TLR - Due:
2011-05-12 - OPEN
o [199]ACTION-507: on - Daniel Appelquist - With Noah to
suggest next steps for TAG on privacy - Due:
2011-05-03 - CLOSED
o [200]ACTION-545: on - Ashok Malhotra - Report to TAG,
after privacy workshop, regarding architecture issue
on privacy and especially degree to which use cases
beyond those addressed by "Do Not Track" need
attention - Due: 2011-05-03 - CLOSED
o Earlier background:
# IETF/W3C Privacy workshop was held at MIT 8-98
December 2011. "Action Items" for W3C were
proposed. See: [201]Action items (PDF - may need
rotating) collected at IETF/W3C Privacy Workshop
wrapup
# [202]ACTION-264: on - Ashok Malhotra - Draft
agenda item for upcoming telcon discussion of
geolocation and privacy - Due: 2009-08-04 -
CLOSED
# [203]ACTION-290: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Write to
Geolocation WG saying "we have concern that the
spec does not say enough user privacy" - Due:
2009-07-30 - CLOSED
# [204]ACTION-408: on - Daniel Appelquist - Look
into next steps on a workshop around device APIs,
privacy etc. with tlr - Due: 2010-03-31 - CLOSED
# [205]ACTION-506: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Noah to
bring proposed W3C Actions on Privacy before the
TAG - TLR to report back to IETF - Due:
2011-01-11 - CLOSED
# Papers from earlier IETF/W3C workshop on privacy
were at
[206]http://www.iab.org/about/workshops/privacy/P
rivacy_Workshop_Papers.zip but that link appears
not to work any more ([207]ACTION-490: on - Noah
Mendelsohn - Noah and others(?) going to privacy
workshop to report back to the TAG? - Due:
2010-12-21 - CLOSED) ([208]ACTION-506: on - Noah
Mendelsohn - Noah to bring proposed W3C Actions
on Privacy before the TAG - TLR to report back to
IETF - Due: 2011-01-11 - CLOSED)
4. Web Applications: Security
+ Goals:
o This will be a brief, and mostly non-technical(!)
discussion of how the TAG can engage on security
issues now that John Kemp is no longer a memeber
+ Background:
o On 11 August there was some [209]encouragement for a
session on security, but goals not really clear
o [210]ACTION-515: on - Larry Masinter - (as trackbot
proxy for John) who will publish
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/02/security-web.html,
slightly cleaned up, with help from Noah and Larry -
Due: 2011-07-30 - OPEN
o [211]ACTION-554: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Formulate
product page for TAG work on security including John
Kemp security draft Due: 2011-05-24 - Due: 2011-09-15
- OPEN
o [212]ACTION-344: on - Jonathan Rees - Alert TAG chair
when CORS and/or UMP goes to LC to trigger security
review - Due: 2011-05-23 - OPEN
o [213]ACTION-516: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Talk with
Thomas Roessler about organizing W3C architecture work
on security - Due: 2011-05-17 - PENDING REVIEW
o [214]ACTION-341: on - Yves Lafon - Follow up with
Thomas about security review activities for HTML5 -
Due: 2011-05-10 - OPEN
o [215]ACTION-417: on - John Kemp - Frame section 7,
security - Due: 2011-01-25 - CLOSED
o See also:
# [216]ACTION-33: on - Henry S. Thompson - revise
naming challenges story in response to Dec 2008
F2F discussion - Due: 2011-06-06 - OPEN
# [217]ACTION-280: on - Dan Connolly - (with John
K) to enumerate some CSRF scenarios discussed in
Jun in Cambridge - Due: 2010-10-11 - CLOSED
# [218]ACTION-340: on - John Kemp - summarize
recent discussion around XHR and UMP - Due:
2010-06-04 - CLOSED
# [219]ACTION-412: on - Dan Connolly - Try the
clarification question, blog item, or wiki
approach to metadata-in-uris vs CSRF - Due:
2010-06-07 - CLOSED
# [220]ACTION-435: on - Jonathan Rees - Consult
Tyler Close regarding UMP-informed web storage
vulnerability analysis - Due: 2010-06-22 - CLOSED
# [221]CORS, UMP and XHR by John Kemp (required
reading for previous F2F)
# John Kemp's [222]note framing a security section
for the architecture of Web Applications
5. RFC 3023bis and IRI
+ Goals:
o Discuss coordination of technical issues relating to
emerging drafts for RFC 3023bis and IRI
o Decide whether TAG should be actively involved in
resolving any of these issues
+ Background:
o Henry [223]provides details of issues to be
considered. The following is adapted from Henry's
note:
# [224]RFC 3023bis and fragment identifiers -- We
discussed this a year ago ([225]minutes) and came
to a conclusion, which Noah took to
[226]ACTION-441 to convey to the 3023 editors.
There was [227]substantial pushback. Jonathan
[228]reported on our further discussion to the
3023 editors, setting out a number of alternative
ways forward. Chris Lilley [229]replied stating a
preference for option 2. But nothing has
happened. . . Time to put a TAG push behind a new
draft of 3023bis?
# 3023bis and Processor Profiles -- The XML
Processing Model WG has produced a [230]Last Call
WD for XML Processing Profiles. Would 3023bis be
the architecturally correct place to connect this
to XML itself?
# IRIbis and HTML5 'URIs' -- The HTML WG has
removed all reference to 3987bis, but the IRI WG
is exploring ways to get back in (the following
is quoted from
[231]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i
ri/2011May/0026.html):
"In March 2011, the W3C's HTML WG made a decision to close
ISSUE-56 when the parties involved could not come to agreement
on aligning HTML5 with the IRI WG's revisions to RFC 3987:
[176] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/products/7
[177] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/APIMinimization-20100605.html
[178] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/APIMinimization-20100605.html
[179] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/05/12-minutes.html#item04
[180] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/02/08-minutes#item01
[181] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/514
[182] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/10/WebappsAPIDesignNotes.html
[183] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Oct/0104.html
[184] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/461
[185] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/products/9
[186] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/566
[187] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Jun/0012.html
[188] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/IAB_Prague_2011_slides.html
[189] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/04/14-minutes.html#item04
[190] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/549
[191] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/460
[192] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/497
[193] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/545
[194] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/08/11-minutes#item04
[195] http://www.w3.org/2011/track-privacy/report
[196] http://www.w3.org/2011/track-privacy/report
[197] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/460
[198] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/550
[199] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/507
[200] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/545
[201]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Dec/att-0061/ActionItems_Workshop.pdf
[202] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/264
[203] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/290
[204] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/408
[205] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/506
[206]
http://www.iab.org/about/workshops/privacy/Privacy_Workshop_Papers.zip
[207] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/490
[208] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/506
[209] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/08/11-minutes#item04
[210] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/515
[211] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/554
[212] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/344
[213] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/516
[214] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/341
[215] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/417
[216] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/33
[217] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/280
[218] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/340
[219] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/412
[220] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/435
[221] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/06/01-cross-domain.html
[222] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/02/security-web.html
[223] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Jun/0005.html
[224] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/latest.html
[225] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/06/9-minutes.html#item03
[226] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/441
[227] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/449
[228] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/476
[229] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Nov/0095.html
[230] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-xml-proc-profiles-20110412/
[231] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2011May/0026.html
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0404.htm
l
"That decision effectively removed the HTML5 specification's
dependency on rfc3987bis. It appears that this was done so
that the HTML5 specification could define how to translate
input strings contained in text/html documents into URIs.
. . .
"However, our understanding is that ISSUE-56 can be reopened if
new information emerges, such as "IETF completing production of
a document suitable as a formal reference". And of course as
chairs of the IRI WG we would like to deliver such a document."
o [232]Paul Grosso notes: Also related to IRIbis is the
XML Core desire to be able to reference it normatively
from the XML and related specs for the definition of
LEIRIs as recorded at
[233]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-co
re-wg/2011Mar/0022 among other places.
6. Open issue review:
+ Goal: review our list of [234]open issues — look especially
for issues that are open but dormant decide to assign
resource/close/leave as background activity.
_________________________________________________________
[232] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Jun/0007.html
[233] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Mar/0022
[234] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/open
Noah Mendelsohn for the TAG
$Revision: 1.21 $ of $Date: 2011/08/30 21:56:30 $
[235]Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional [236]Valid CSS!
[235] http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer
[236] http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2011 01:03:39 UTC