- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:33:08 -0400
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Ian Jacobs <ij@W3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
[adding Philippe] On 8/10/2011 1:25 PM, Noah Mendelsohn wrote: > Jeff, > > When you met with us in June, we agreed to provide you with > information on at least two major TAG projects that you could track as > deliverables for 2011 and beyond. > > In fact, we are attempting to be both more organized and more public > about identifying the goals, success criteria, deliverables, target > dates, etc. for our key projects. We have set up a publicly visible > work plan page, which I think has what we promised you and somewhat > more. It's available at [1], and it will be updated as our plans change. Thanks, this is great! > > Note that for each project, a link is provided to a page that includes > high-level goals, specific success criteria, dates for key > deliverables or at least for next steps, names of TAG members taking > the lead, etc. (The exception is the HTML5 Last Call Review, which has > generated significant results in a number of areas in 2011, but which > was largely done by the time the product page structure was put in > place). > > If you are looking for two specific projects to evaluate for 2011, Each of our "Objectives" has a W3M person who is tracking them. The W3Mer who is tracking "TAG" is Timbl. So it is not me who is looking for two specific projects - but he. All I did was suggest the idea of having two specific projects. > I would suggest the HTML5 review work, which represented significant > effort in 2011 (and before), and which has produced results in a > number of areas, and the Web Application State effort, which should > result in a TAG finding publication in 2011. Accordingly, if Timbl agrees with you, I would agree as well. I guess that both of these relate strongly to the Interaction Domain. In that case, we could have Timbl and Philippe track these together. > Another possibility would be the project on fragment identifiers, but > with one caveat: the 31 December 2011 target for a TAG finding was set > before Jeni Tennison was asked to focus more on the microdata/RDFa > task force work, and I don't yet have commitments from TAG members to > backfill on the same schedule. I expect the fragid work will get done, > and done well, but perhaps a bit later than we originally thought. We > will, of course, update that work plan and product page when and if we > revise our schedule. > > In any case, I encourage you to track all of our significant projects > using to the work plan page at [1], and to point others to it when > they have questions about the TAG's ongoing work. Yes, thanks. > > Thank you. > > Noah > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/ > > Tracker: this email fulfills TAG ACTION-568 > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2011 17:33:01 UTC