www-forms@w3.org from January 2002 by author

A Rafael D Teixeira

• Re: Submission of high-value characters from an XFORMS form (Wednesday, 2 January)

Alistair Coles

• how to make relevant only when valueChanged? (Monday, 28 January)
• clarification of revalidate vs recalculate (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Order of xforms:revalidate and xforms:recalculate (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Order of xforms:revalidate and xforms:recalculate (Wednesday, 2 January)

AndrewWatt2001@aol.com

• Chapter 8.8 - submit form control (Thursday, 17 January)
• 8.9 - the selectOne form control (Thursday, 17 January)
• listItem and listItems datatypes (Friday, 11 January)
• xsd:decimal type - too parochial? (Friday, 11 January)
• Implementations of December XForms WD? (Monday, 7 January)

Benjamin D. Gray

• RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms (Wednesday, 23 January)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: PUT (Tuesday, 22 January)

Bruce Atherton

• RE: PUT (Saturday, 19 January)

Chris Haynes

• Re: Should we really care about legacy? (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: PUT (Saturday, 12 January)
• Submission of high-value characters from an XFORMS form (Wednesday, 2 January)

Dan Dennedy

• RE: XForms, client or server layer (Thursday, 24 January)

Dave Johnson

• Dynamic dropdown data sources (Friday, 1 February)

David E. Cleary

• RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: Should instance element be optional? (Tuesday, 15 January)

Edwin Ortega

• Re: XForms, XML media types, SOAP (Wednesday, 16 January)

Hiroshi Iwasaki

• Question about changelog (Tuesday, 29 January)

Jay Stoler

• XForm specifications (Monday, 21 January)

John J. Barton

• XForms Basic. (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: PUT (Wednesday, 16 January)

Jouni Heikniemi

• RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms (Thursday, 24 January)

Jérôme Nègre

• Re: About the new (?) draft 18 january 2002 (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: XForm specifications (Monday, 21 January)
• About the bind element (Friday, 18 January)
• About the new (?) draft 18 january 2002 (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Should instance element be optional? (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: type of instance data (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: xsd:decimal type - too parochial? (Monday, 14 January)
• Re: type of instance data (Monday, 14 January)
• type of instance data (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Invitation to contribute examples (Thursday, 10 January)
• Event xforms:toggle (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Event xforms:focus (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: scope of id() (was: recalculating several models) (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Invitation to contribute examples (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: scope of id() (was: recalculating several models) (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: scope of id() (was: recalculating several models) (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: recalculating several models (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: recalculating several models (Monday, 7 January)
• recalculating several models (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: Order of xforms:revalidate and xforms:recalculate (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Order of xforms:revalidate and xforms:recalculate (Friday, 4 January)

Klotz, Leigh

• Re: Reusable form controls (Tuesday, 15 January)

Mark Baker

• Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Thursday, 17 January)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: PUT (Saturday, 19 January)
• Re: PUT (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: PUT (Tuesday, 15 January)
• PUT (Friday, 11 January)
• XForms, XML media types, SOAP (Friday, 11 January)

Micah Dubinko

• RE: FW: XForms how-to - Question 3 (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Question about changelog (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: About the new (?) draft 18 january 2002 (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: XForms, client or server layer (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: XForms, client or server layer (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: XForms WD 20020118 - Questions about instanceData (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: XForms WD 20020118 - Questions about instanceData (Tuesday, 22 January)
• RE: Creating, editing and viewing of data (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: FORMs and GET (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: Should instance element be optional? (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: XForms, XML media types, SOAP (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: PUT (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: Restriction for submit event in section 11.4.1 (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: PUT (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: type of instance data (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: PUT (Saturday, 12 January)
• RE: listItem and listItems datatypes (Saturday, 12 January)
• RE: type of instance data (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: Section 2.7 Example Revisions (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: New WD, Section 2.7 Complete Document (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: The RDF in WD-xforms-20011207 (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: New Specification errors (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: scope of id() (was: recalculating several models) (Tuesday, 8 January)
• RE: scope of id() (was: recalculating several models) (Tuesday, 8 January)
• FYI: XForms at O'Reilly Open Source/XTech 2002 in San Diego (Monday, 7 January)
• scope of id() (was: recalculating several models) (Monday, 7 January)

Mikko Honkala

• RE: XForms how-to (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: XForms how-to (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: simple question about buttons in conjunction with javascript (Thursday, 24 January)
• ANNOUNCE: X-Smiles 0.5, with partial XForms Last Call WD support (Monday, 21 January)

mmmmmm

• [www-forms] <none> (Monday, 14 January)

Naresh Bhatia

• RE: XForms WD 20020118 - Questions about instanceData (Monday, 21 January)
• Creating, editing and viewing of data (Monday, 21 January)
• Repeating nested structures (Monday, 21 January)
• XForms WD 20020118 - Questions about instanceData (Sunday, 20 January)

Paul Prescod

• Re: Should we really care about legacy? (Saturday, 26 January)
• Re: Should we really care about legacy? (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Saturday, 19 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Thursday, 17 January)
• FORMs and GET (Thursday, 17 January)

Paul Sagi

• forms (Friday, 1 February)

Plechsmíd Martin

• RE: FW: XForms how-to - Question 3 (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: FW: XForms how-to (Tuesday, 29 January)

Plechšmíd Martin

• RE: XForms how-to (Tuesday, 29 January)
• FW: XForms how-to (Monday, 28 January)

Ray Cromwell

• RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Problems to interpret an attribute value as an Xpath expression (Thursday, 10 January)
• Reusable form controls (Thursday, 3 January)

Robert Koberg

• new form controls (Tuesday, 15 January)

Roland Merrick

• RE: FW: XForms how-to - Question 3 (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: FW: XForms how-to (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Invitation to contribute examples (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Invitation to contribute examples (Thursday, 10 January)

Roman Huditsch

• simple question about buttons in conjunction with javascript (Thursday, 24 January)
• AW: XForms WD 20020118 - Questions about instanceData (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Problems to interpret an attribute value as an Xpath expression (Thursday, 10 January)
• AW: recalculating several models (Monday, 7 January)

Steven Pemberton

• Reminder about last call comments (Friday, 25 January)
• Last call announcement for XForms 1.0 (Friday, 18 January)
• Invitation to contribute examples (Tuesday, 8 January)

T. V. Raman

• Re: Should instance element be optional? (Tuesday, 15 January)
• insert action suggestion (Monday, 14 January)
• Add XSLT transform element to head element set (Monday, 14 January)
• Problems to interpret an attribute value as an Xpath expression (Thursday, 10 January)

Taylor Cowan

• XForms, client or server layer (Wednesday, 23 January)

thierry michel

• Re: ANNOUNCE: X-Smiles 0.5, with partial XForms Last Call WD support (Monday, 21 January)
• The XForms 1.0 Last Call Working Draft is now public. (Friday, 18 January)

Tomayko, Ryan

• RE: About the new (?) draft 18 january 2002 (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: FORMs and GET (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: Invitation to contribute examples (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: scope of id() (was: recalculating several models) (Tuesday, 8 January)
• RE: scope of id() (was: recalculating several models) (Tuesday, 8 January)
• RE: recalculating several models (Monday, 7 January)
• RE: recalculating several models (Monday, 7 January)
• RE: recalculating several models (Monday, 7 January)

tvraman@almaden.ibm.com

• Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: FORMs and GET (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: FORMs and GET (Friday, 18 January)

Vun Kannon, David

• XML Schema for XLink (Thursday, 24 January)

Werner Donné

• Should we really care about legacy? (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: PUT (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Should instance element be optional? (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Restriction for submit event in section 11.4.1 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Restriction for submit event in section 11.4.1 (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: Should instance element be optional? (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Should instance element be optional? (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Should instance element be optional? (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: type of instance data (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: insert action suggestion (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Add XSLT transform element to head element set (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: insert action suggestion (Thursday, 10 January)
• insert action suggestion (Tuesday, 8 January)
• cursor update (Tuesday, 8 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2002 21:45:40 UTC