- From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@cardiff.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:46:57 -0800
- To: "'AndrewWatt2001@aol.com'" <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, www-forms@w3.org
Andrew, Correct on both counts. This is fixed for our next publish. Since 'relevant' expects a boolean result, the correct syntax is: relevant="my:payment/@as = 'credit'" .micah -----Original Message----- From: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com [mailto:AndrewWatt2001@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 5:51 AM To: www-forms@w3.org Subject: Re: New WD, Section 2.7 Complete Document In a message dated 11/12/01 13:24:14 GMT Standard Time, roman.huditsch@hico.com writes: Reading the new WD, I noticed that in the example in Section 2.7 there are some brackets missing. I think that relevant="my:payment/@as == 'credit'" should be replaced by relevant="my:payment/[@as == 'credit']" as it is written in section 2.5. But I must confess that I didn't try wheater it would work in that way, too. Hi Roman, I think there are errors in your suggested correction, as well as in the new WD First it is, as I understand it, illegal in XPath to follow a "/" with a predicate. Second the use of "==" as an equality test is not an XPath 1.0 construct, to the best of my knowledge. In XPath "=" is used and I think the WD needs to be corrected in that regard, since I understand the intent is to follow XPath 1.0 syntax. Andrew Watt
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2002 19:49:08 UTC